I read Keyes' piece and am not convinced that he is accurately articulating Cain's position so it seems likely to me that we have a straw man situation: characterize Cain's position (i.e. build the strawman) and then knock it down.
I'm followed Keyes for a long time and am a bit uncomfortable with him since I've seen him all too often over simplify things and mischaracterize them. I may be being unfair but I'm not convinced he's correct on Cain.
I have reservations about Alan Keyes. He's a perennial candidate who pays himself a salary from campaign contributions. He seems to me to be part of the Republican party apparatus who is used as a stalking horse to undermine the candidacy of other conservatives. He generally divides the pro-life vote. I'm not saying he is really pro-abortion, I'm just making an observation about his impact.
He's certainly an articulate and passionate speaker, but I was totally disgusted when he helped deep-six Pat Buchanan's candidacy in 1996.
Comments are moderated. Please be respectful. Argument (in the classical sense) is welcome, however crude, or obscene remarks will not be posted. I am more lenient with ad hominem attacks since so many people these days don't seem to know how to engage in a discussion without them.
Diocese of Arlington & Archdiocese of Washington,D.C. Bloggers
3 comments:
Here's Keyes' takedown of Cain's abortion stance http://aipnews.com/talk/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=22615&posts=1 .
Keyes is an Abel alternative to Cain.
He can sing better, too http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqGgNYbT8_Y
I read Keyes' piece and am not convinced that he is accurately articulating Cain's position so it seems likely to me that we have a straw man situation: characterize Cain's position (i.e. build the strawman) and then knock it down.
I'm followed Keyes for a long time and am a bit uncomfortable with him since I've seen him all too often over simplify things and mischaracterize them. I may be being unfair but I'm not convinced he's correct on Cain.
I have reservations about Alan Keyes. He's a perennial candidate who pays himself a salary from campaign contributions. He seems to me to be part of the Republican party apparatus who is used as a stalking horse to undermine the candidacy of other conservatives. He generally divides the pro-life vote. I'm not saying he is really pro-abortion, I'm just making an observation about his impact.
He's certainly an articulate and passionate speaker, but I was totally disgusted when he helped deep-six Pat Buchanan's candidacy in 1996.
Post a Comment