They never met a democratic pro-abort they didn't worship. Obama and Sebelius are icons of their liberal religion. But oh how they wax eloquent in going after Mitt Romney for acts against life. What hypocrites! As one who is undecided on whether to vote for either Tweedle Dum or Tweedle Dee, I certainly can recognize unabashed hypocrisy when I see it. The only thing Catholics United can be depended upon is to advance the liberal agenda no matter how many twists and turns it requires. Re-electing their God Obama is the top priority and if they have to turn themselves inside out to do it, they will pursue that end. And, by the way, when is a Catholic bishop going to show the same zeal for forbidding faux Catholic dissent groups like Catholics United and Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good from using the name Catholic as the Archdiocese of Detroit did in going after orthodox Real Catholic TV? Anyone? Anyone?
Catholics United launches pro-life attack on Romney
Look Mary Ann
ReplyDeletethis isn't tweedle-dum or tweedle-dee. We just gotta get that Obama out of hte White House. You want him out because of his support for abortion, OK, I agree with that but I want him out because of his stupid ideas about taxes. My wife wants him out because he is a socialist. My brother-in-law wants him out because my brother-in-law is a racist. I don't care why people want him out we just gotta get him out, for whatever reason. anybody is better because nobody is worse
Love your stuff, Mary Ann!
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure if it's Tweedledum versus Tweedledee; rather Tweedledum versus Tweedledumber.
Yes, we have to get Obama out of the White House; my only worry isd that we might - just might! - get someone worse. Remember Murphy.
Good stuff, Mary Ann. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteI hear ya, but I'm not sure it makes a whit of difference in the long run. I suspect Romney will be in bed with the neo-cons and that makes war in the Middle East more likely. He is also gung-ho for the homosexuals as well as being bad on abortion.
ReplyDeleteWe have more possibility of controlling the White House if we elect decent men and women to Congress and bolster state governments. But a turnaround there looks like a pretty bleak prospect also.
I think we will be in dire straights no matter which one of these men is elected. Unless we return to God and repent, the U.S. is finished and whether that happens under a Republican or a Democrat is rather a moot point. Keep in mind that John Roberts was a Republican appointee and so was the Roe v. Wade court.
Frankly, I'm not sure who would be worse in God's eyes. I'll be praying between now and November about voting. Obama is certainly morally disqualified. I'll be praying about whether I can, in good conscience, vote for Romney as the lesser of two evils who will do less damage.
If we're talking about the lesser of two evils, then Obama wins at my house. I love the health care act (which is not socialism - if it were, then you wouldn't be required to purchase insurance from private companies, you'd be paying a tax for a national health care service). Everyone has to pick what the most important issue is to them because neither candidate fits the total bill for everyone.
ReplyDeleteCan't agree TTC. The health care act is an abomination if for no other reason than that it mandates abortifacient birth control. The murder of the unborn is a crime against humanity and Obama's radical support for it (including murder by negligence of babies born alive after abortion) aligns him with the greatest tyrants of history.
ReplyDeleteLots of us consider birth control basic health care. There is a big difference between preventing a pregnancy and ending one and honestly, while I wouldn't have an abortion myself, I don't feel that I can stand up and say someone else should be forced to stay pregnant who doesn't want to be.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that there is difference between preventing pregnancy and ending one. But, as a Natural Family Planning teacher I know that all chemical methods of birth control cause abortions some or all of the time by preventing the embryo from implanting in the womb. The morning after pill which is defined as a "contraceptive" (It's not.) always causes abortion unless the woman isn't pregnant in which case she didn't need it.
ReplyDeleteIf I used your same reasoning and said, "I wouldn't rape anyone but I can't say someone else should be forced not to rape if he wants to" what would you say? Abortion and rape are very similar. They both involve a bigger and stronger person attacking a weaker one. Why do people so often try to justify the one, while condemning the other? Is it because the baby is invisible to us and it's easy to kill someone you don't see?
I don't happen to believe that people should be discriminated against because they are smaller than the rest of us and happen to be dependent on someone. We've all been dependent at one time or another. A newborn is dependent. Is it okay for a mom to kill the baby thirty seconds after birth rather than "force her to be a mother" if she changes her mind? Some people think so. Some so-called "ethicists" are arguing for after-birth abortions. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ethicists-argue-in-favor-of-after-birth-abortions-as-newborns-are-not-persons/ The fact that this is being discussed shows exactly how depraved our culture has become.
Is there really much difference between throwing a newborn in a dumpster, injecting digoxin into the heart of a 6 month old in utero, ripping a seven week old limb from limb in a suction abortion or flushing out an embryo?
If you are the one it happens to, you'll be just as dead whenever it happens.
Twiddledee and Twiddledum sounds like you believe Twaddle that Obama and liberals are touting
ReplyDeleteObama - most pro-abortion president in history, destroyer of religious freedom. Romney - not!
Pro-life advocates in Mass. say he is pro-life.
http://www.lifenews.com/2012/01/02/pro-life-advocates-in-massachusetts-say-romney-is-pro-life/
Mary Ann Glendon destroys all of the flak about his record on religious freedom in Mass
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/mary-ann-glendon-defends-romney-on-religious-freedom/
Wow! Don't vote and you will be pulling a John Roberts in my books. Believing Obama's made up garbage and rewriting the story the way he wants.
One more thing. Who advises Obama on judges? Your guess is as good as mine.
ReplyDeleteWho are the chairpersons of Mitt Romney's Advisory Committee – Judge Robert Bork, Professor Mary Ann Glendon, and Richard Wiley.
'no difference' "we might as well not show up' my goodness I often agree with you but not now.
I'll check out those sources and thanks. I'm a little cynical about the Republicans these days since they continually nominate "moderates" who are democrat-lite with the attitude that social conservatives have no place to go. Romney is clearly the lesser of two evils, but he's certainly no hero. Seems to me the choice is between fast death and slightly slower death.
ReplyDelete