Democrats Read Transgender Book on House Floor

L - Jazz, a biological boy;
R - Jazz' book about his life as a girl

LifeSite News has a March 5 article with video posted on their site saying:

 "Democrats read a book about having a 'girl brain but a boy body' on the US House floor last week. To commemorate a day set aside by pro-LGBT lobbyists and the nation’s largest teacher union to promote gender fluidity, two Democrat congresswomen read the infamous transgender children’s book I Am Jazz on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives last Thursday.

"Sponsored by the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) Foundation and the National Education Association (NEA), the fourth annual 'Jazz and Friends National Day of School and Community Readings' is supposedly meant to help 'foster safe and welcoming schools and communities for young people who still rarely hear affirming stories of LGBTQ people,' according to HRC’s website."

What can I say except THREE YEARS AGO I knew that the National Education Association (NEA) was heavily involved in promoting the transgender agenda in public schools, and said so on Les Femmes on March 26, 2016. The article is reprinted in full below.

The NEA's Transgender Agenda and the Winter Cover of NEA Today

NEA Today cover photo
of transgender child,
Winter 2016

The powerful voice of the National Education Association’s (NEA) quarterly magazine, NEA Today, has a circulation of 2.7 million. Add that number to global digital access and the circulation soars to many more millions across America, as well as the world.

With many millions of teachers reading NEA Today, the National Education Association is furnished mega opportunities for propagating agendas of various sorts, dripping their poison into every classroom in the nation, trickling into the minds and souls of our children. These agendas of the moment have high acceptability because they are clad in the seeming respectability of a powerful and influential teachers’ union flagship publication. Is there a better way to spread the current explosion of the pernicious transgender agenda in society than through our schools?

NEA’s abnormal love affair with the transgender agenda births immoral ideas of gender inside the minds of our children where, in public school sex education classes, the definition of human is neither male nor female, but rather an odd assortment of various sexes and genders according to feelings.

This incredible hiatus from reality is evident in other areas of the NEA such as the fact that the publishers of NEA Today’s Winter 2016 issue think that no one sees through their bait-and-switch tactics. The corresponding article to the front cover is Good News! They are Reading! found on page 38. Page 39 shows a full page color photo of a high school black male success story with a corresponding sub article, Improving Reading Outcomes for Young Black Males, so why does the magazine’s cover photo portray an elementary age white female child?

In this photo, all the girls are biological boys
and all the boys are biological girls.

This current issue (Here) is shot through with articles on racism and the stereotyping of students of color so a cover picture of an elementary age white female student is peculiar unless, of course, it’s a subliminal message of NEA’s transgender agenda. The key word in the article’s page 38 title is "They" and the bait-and-switch of course is to get one away from thinking about stereotyping students of color to stereotyping other categories of students. But elementary age white female students are hardly a group to be stereotyped so what is the importance of the child in the cover photo?

For proof that the NEA is in a closely intertwined relationship with the transgender agenda their own website substantiates that fact. (Here) By searching "transgender students", 478 articles appear which should be enough to legitimately ask questions concerning the cover photo’s significance.

The point is this: Is the child so prominently featured on NEA Today’s Winter 2016 cover a gender non-conforming child? That is, is the child really a girl, or is the child a boy dressed like a girl, meaning a biological boy self-identifying as a girl? Does the cover photo convey the message that "They" also includes transgender children and that the child pictured in the cover photo is a transgender child? It’s confusing. What was once so easy isn't any more because of insidious agendas from organizations like the NEA. Girl or boy? Boy or girl? Is this NEA Today cover a subliminal message promoting the NEA's "diversity" agenda? Of course it is.