Looking upon the Lord does not distance us from the tragedies of history. Instead, it opens our eyes to the suffering of those around us and penetrates us: the faces of war-stricken terrorised children, weeping mothers, the shattered dreams of so many young people, refugees who face terrible journeys, the victims of climate change and social injustice.
Read Cobalt Red: How the Blood of the Congo Powers Our Lives |
"The whole People of God is an agent of the proclamation of the Gospel. Every baptised person is called to be a protagonist of mission since we are all missionary disciples" (ITC 53). For this reason, the synodal journey directs us towards a full and visible unity of Christians, as was witnessed by the presence of delegates of other Christian traditions. Unity ferments silently within the holy Church of God; prophetically so, for the entire world.
Wow! So we no longer need to actively work for the conversion of those outside the Church because unity "ferments silently." This fits with other statements of Francis demonizing the active missionary impulse among the faithful as "proselytizing" and a big no-no!
Matt Gaspers, writing at OnePeterFive explains that The Key to Understanding the Synod: “It Is a Continuation of Vatican II”. This is confirmed in the document itself:
...the synodal journey constitutes an authentic further act of reception of the Council, thus deepening its inspiration and reinvigorating its prophetic force for today’s world.
Gaspers goes on to write:
This is the key to understanding the Synod, which, in many ways, was a continuation of the battle between what attorney and author Christopher Ferrara has called “the party of Catholic Tradition on the one hand, in continuity with all that the Church has handed down in her doctrine and practice through the centuries … and, on the other hand, the party of innovation, modernization, liberalization, adaptation, indeed revolution in the Church.”[3] This is the battle that was waged during the Council, and it continues in the Church today.
The interminable synod process seems oriented toward turning the church into a democracy where the majority may pitch out old, useless doctrines based on unchanging truth and introduce new ones based on the seven deadly sins, a staple of modernism.
Joseph Cardinal Zen |
Since the beginning of this Synod, the two cardinals who lead the assembly and the new prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith did not stress the preservation of the faith, but emphasized changes, especially changes to the Church’s structure and ethical teachings; especially regarding “sex” ethical principles, most of all: same-sex relations. [N.B. 26% of synod participants were not bishops and laity were allowed to vote which deviates from the traditional definition of synodality with the hierarchy advising the pope.]
Catholic Vote, reporting on the Cardinal's critique wrote:
The Cardinal argued that three things must occur before the Synod can be said to have ended well. First, it must return to the traditional sense of the word [synodal]; second, it must resolve the confusion surrounding same-sex blessings in clear terms in light of Church doctrine; and third, the importance of Church hierarchy must be reestablished for the continuity of a universal Church.Warning Catholics not to become discouraged or anxious about the crisis in the Church, Cardinal Zen advises, “Fast and pray (especially the Rosary)! Hope will never get disappointed.” And remember that the cross is always a blessing that brings about conversion. Instead of lamenting it, let us embrace it enthusiastically.
If you want to be Catholic you have to accept all nonsense that comes from Rome. Otherwise, Just admit to being a Lutheran already.
ReplyDeleteYou're obviously not a Catholic or you wouldn't say that. There's been plenty of nonsense from Rome in the 2000 years of Catholic history. You have to distinguish between orthodoxy and heterodoxy. If a member of the hierarchy, even the pope, teaches heterodoxy, the faithful have an obligation to challenge him "to his face". In 2005, Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI commented that “the pope is not an oracle; he is infallible in very rare situations, as we know.” Infallibility outside of the pope speaking ex cathedra, which has only happened twice, occurs when the hierarchy is unified with the pope in teaching, but no teaching can conflict with doctrine. Truth doesn't change. Today bishops are at odds and there is no agreement on most of what comes out of Rome. That's because much of it is nonsense and conflicts with Scripture and Sacred Tradition. Even if the pope says it, the faithful have to refuse to swallow it lest their faith be poisoned.
ReplyDelete