Search This Blog

Saturday, May 17, 2025

Historical Misrepresentation: How Many "Heroes" Were Really Villains...?

...and how many villains were really heroes? These are serious questions. As they say, the winners write the history. So always look at the reports from biased contemporaries with a jaundiced eye. Politicians who win don't make trustworthy critics of their political enemies. Neither do the losers for that matter. A little time is necessary to evaluate the real impact of movers and shakers. 

I think of all those who insisted Shakespeare wasn't Shakespeare. Now we know a lot more about his background. Some of the prejudice was pure snobbishness. Shakespeare wasn't educated enough to write his brilliant plays. It had to be someone else. Now we know, based on evidence, that he was a Catholic and a recusant. He left Blackfriars Gatehouse, which he purchased before retiring to Stratford, to his daughter Susanna who remained a Catholic and was brought before the court at one point as a recusant as opposed to her sister who became Protestant. The Gatehouse became a safe house and center of Catholic activity. See The Catholicism of William Shakespeare. The plays are chock full of Catholic imagery!

There are many examples of "history" that over the years must be revised because of new information and exposure of prejudicial actions suppressing, ignoring, or distorting the past. Errors? Dishonesty? They play a part. Here are just a few examples:

  • The Crusades -- They saved Christian Europe from being overtaken by Islam. Without the crusades we would all be kneeling toward Mecca. And yet the crusades today are almost always discussed in a pejorative sense. I would be happy to walk in the footsteps of St. Louis IX, a saint and a crusader. Check out this article, Three Big Myths about the Crusades.
  • Francisco Franco -- He saved Spain from becoming the spearhead of Communism in Europe and yet he is, to this day, always labeled a dictator and tyrant. I'm currently reading a novel partly set in Spain during Franco's reign. Not surprisingly, he is portrayed negatively. For a more balanced view, read historian Warren Carroll's The Last Crusade. 
  • Abraham Lincoln -- The "Great Emancipator" who never freed a single slave, would happily have maintained slavery if it could preserve the union. In the only court case he ever argued about slavery, lawyer Lincoln defended the slaveholder. His generals (Grant, Sherman, Sheridan, Custer) practiced unrestricted warfare against civilians (and the Indians later). Today we would describe their scorched earth warfare against every Southern resident including women and children as war crimes. I used to believe the St. Abraham propaganda until I read Lincoln's own letters and thought, "He sounds like Bill Clinton." Then I read Thomas DiLorenzo's book, The Real Lincoln. What an eye-opener! Telling the truth about Lincoln and the unnecessary war between the states invariably gets me accused of being pro-slavery.
  • Joseph McCarthy -- Poor Senator Joe McCarthy has been vilified by the left from the beginning for his bulldog determination to root Communists out of government and expose the damage to our democracy and culture. Are we surprised? Many leftists are, in fact, Communists, using the more benign term today of "socialist." McCarthy was hounded during his lifetime and continues to be a bogeyman to the left today. Do a search on his name and be prepared for an avalanche of sewage. But if you examine the McCarthy investigations ("witch hunt" to the left), he was mostly right. The treatment of President Trump shows that the same smear campaigns are popular today. I plan to read Blacklisted by History (2007) by M. Stanton Evans revealing the truth of the McCarthy era. Howard Phillips interviewed Evans on his Conservative Roundtable. It's well worth watching. Joe McCarthy revealed the truth about Communist penetration of the U.S. government. He was a hero of truth, who loved America. He was "deplorable" before his time, one who became the victim of an organized ad hominem character assassination that probably contribued to his death.
All these examples illustrate how easy it is to blind and manipulate the masses with a tsunami of propaganda, especially from the mainstream media that hypes the lie and buries the truth. You need to know who you can trust among historians and commentators. By all means read both sides. We all have our biases, but who has the proof? The strategy of the left is to smear and attack those they consider "enemies." We've seen it bigtime. It was especially evident during COVID when board certified physicians, leaders in their field were cancelled and attacked for following the science. And how many are dying now because they swallowed the lies? 

Always pray to know the truth. As always, scripture provides the answer:
...sanctify the Lord Christ in your hearts, being ready always to satisfy every one that asketh you a reason of that hope which is in you. But with modesty and fear, having a good conscience: that whereas they speak evil of you, they may be ashamed who falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ.

When you love the truth and serve the truth you are serving Him Who is "the Way, the Truth, and the Life." 

18 comments:

  1. In every age, history proves what becomes of men who reject God, His Commandments, and His Church, for Her mission always was, and will be until the end of time, to save souls. Man by his ignorance, his arrogance who reject these truths, becomes like a wild, untamed beast, even when he smiles, is considered as a man of good standing, successful…..etc.

    ‘The Fall of Rome was a judgment on human pride; the Religious (English) Revolution was a judgment on human sin; the French Revolution was a judgment on human avarice and selfishness.”
    ~ F. Sheen

    Pride, Sin, Avarice , Selfishness and Greed, will be the Fall of a boastful Empire of our day! For in these times, men have ceased to exist……he is only a number, instrument, quantity, a tool, a function for the mass. Propaganda is the name of the DAY!.......to be blind, and deaf is a ‘choice’, according to the whims of the day and times. There’s now no God but Caesar!

    “Nothing ever happens to the world which does not first happen inside man.”
    ~ F. Sheen

    ReplyDelete
  2. …….The strategy of the left is to smear and attack those they consider "enemies." We've seen it bigtime. It was especially evident during COVID when board certified physicians, leaders in their field were cancelled and attacked for following the science. And how many are dying now because they swallowed the lies? …..

    Is Trump ‘the lesser evil’, regarding vaccinations?…….doubtful……
    Trump Promises Enough Coronavirus Vaccine Doses for Every American by April | National News | US News
    Trump takes credit for vaccine rollout: 'One of the greatest miracles of the ages' | TheHill

    Is Trump ‘the lesser evil’ regarding Palestine (Gaza)?......doubtful.
    Trump posts bizarre AI video of 'Trump Gaza' featuring Elon Musk, Netanyahu lying on beach - LifeSite

    In every age man struggles for his own soul, for the soul of the Church, and the struggle for the soul of its nation, it is a reality that cannot be ignored……..for the soul is rooted in the realm of the supernatural……and those who should know better, unthinkingly, and naively follow those who are soulless.

    As someone once wrote: ‘we live in Fatima Times every day, many times very ignorant off…..a crisis of faith, crisis of politics, crisis of civilization – an all-encompassing crisis.’

    Our Lady of Fatima pray for us, for we are living in a diabolical times!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Pelagius never taught we don't need grace. I read his commentary on Romans. So yeah, mainstream narratives are bunk.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A small group of traditionalist cardinals appointed by Benedict 16 met in secret and elected Trump as Pope before the larger body of cardinals appointed by Francis elected Prevost. Ergo Trump is the true Pope and that is what Trump was signaling with that image he posted.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great article. You had better get a guard dog! Lincoln -- 600,000 dead. Did that have to happen?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I always thought McCarthy got a raw deal.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The problem these days is not even so much finding truth among the lies. That has always been part of life in a fallen world. The problem now is that the lies are so intrinsic to the fabric of our society and its comprehensive mass-media technology - the soul in the godless machine in which we live and struggle to remain Christian - that we often don’t even have the metric to know what is real and what is a manufactured fake.

    Here is an interesting article that details the tactics used by lying mass-media enemies to manipulate not just a few unfortunate souls but an entire population. And in the age of AI, that invisible “dark soul in the machine” has incredible powers to deceive many and adapt its way to getting its way eventually.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/rogan-guest-reveals-facebooks-secret-experiment-manipulated-700000-users

    The battle we are in is invisible, at the level of souls - and so existentially more important than visible, physical. And we can’t defend ourselves from defeat unless we first know we are in a fight, second what are the weapons of war, and three what strategies and tactics to not just survive but win.

    It’s one reason (for example) I’m wary of “anonymous” commenters. I look for recognizable names (or at least screen names like mine, which I’ve used for at least 20 years) as a kind of reference point.

    And it’s also a big reason I don’t read much media (including Catholic) any more - because I just don’t trust so much of it.

    As you infer in your post, we need to be wise as serpents, innocent as doves, and discerners of truth (and Truth) to remain on the narrow path. Remain within the one, holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church, under the care of your Priest, in union with the Holy Father, in a state of grace, receiving all the Sacraments regularly with your family and friends … THAT is the simple, sure path to heaven.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's hard to make judgments about heroes and villains. A hero to the Greeks is a villain or arch enemy to the Trojans and vice versa. Catholic or no Shakespeare villified Richard III -- some say following Catholic Thomas More who many opine villified Richard III as "Tudor propaganda" but may have simply taken on (trusted) the "facts" given him by his mentor Morton (or his own parents).

    http://www.tudorplace.com.ar/Bios/JohnMorton.htm

    https://www.shakespeare.org.uk/explore-shakespeare/blogs/shakespeares-richard-iii-myth-or-reality/

    "The Dean explained: “It could not therefore differentiate between Richard III or Henry VII — or another — being the guilty party."
    https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1331220/queen-elizabeth-ii-news-princes-in-tower-richard-iii-westminster-abbey-dna-spt

    I have no idea what is the 'truth' about Richard III anymore than I know who blew up the Nordstream pipeline or if in fact it was actually blown up at all. Same about 911 or the assassinations of JFK, RFK & MLK or the many affairs of the Kennedy brothers as told by the "reliable" Seymour Hersh (funny how his bio of almost exclusively JFK's womanizing said nothing about the assassination). Maybe on judgment day we will know the truth about each other's hearts, meanwhile I would not spend my time trying to evaluate (or judge) the movers and shakers. The son of David on Palm Sunday became the reviled criminal in less than a week. My religious books counsel me to not seek for the esteem of men in imitation of Christ and in fact to take no notice of the judgments of men because the judgment of God alone matters. It says do not be curious after news or the latest gossip or spend time disputing which of the saints (let alone which of the movers and shakers) is the greatest because you'll just end up offending God. Unfortunately, I do enjoy a good story or mystery and "keeping myself informed" have wasted many years of my life on novels, histories, biographies and current events/reading editorial pages/"news" magazines that expressed my views to a tee -- however, I no longer equate these entertainments/distractions with seeking (or finding or serving) 'truth.'

    And how many are dying because they swallowed the lies? https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2025/05/01/the-bodies-are-not-stacking-up-again/

    PS Trump is the same age as you. Perhaps he should be keeping bees with the 'old people.'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd be glad to share my bees with Trump. I'd rather play with the bees than play golf and I suspect you learn a lot more from them than from chasing a ball around the green. On the other hand golf is better exercise if you walk the course.

      I agree with much of what you say, but there is a matter of justice when you see people demonize and slander "their enemies" who have a right to their good name. It's also impossible to practice the spiritual work of mercy "to admonish the sinner" without making judgments about behavior.

      I don't think "reading novels, histories, biographies," etc. reflect "wasted...years." Fr. John Hardon's Lifetime Catholic Reading Plan includes all of those categories. And I've found many of them rich sources of reflection and meditation. Robert Hugh Benson's novels are a good example and, of course, biographies of the saints, and, yes, even current events (and historical ones).

      Delete
  9. https://www.lincolncottage.org/top-ten-lincoln-lawyer/


    "3) Lincoln fought the sale of an African American woman

    In 1841 Lincoln represented Nance Legins-Costley, an African American woman who had been sold. He argued that the sale of people in Illinois was illegal due to Illinois’ status as a free state. Lincoln won the case and Nance was freed from her position. "

    The Emancipation Proclamation freed slaves. Amendments 13 and 14 would arguably not exist if not for Lincoln in particular his Gettysburg Address and Second Inaugural.

    Lincoln deserves to be measured by his actions at end of life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the correction about the legal case where Lincoln represented Nance Legins-Costley. The fact that he would take either side of the slavery issue illustrates pragmatism. As for the Emancipation Proclamation (EP), it only freed slaves in the South where his jurisdiction was not recognized. It didn't free the slaves in the border states that remained in the Union, another example of his cynical pragmatism. Your claim that the 13th and 14th amendment would not exist except for the EP and Gettysburg Address are disputed by this article. His original 13th amendment offered to the South called for a decades long gradual emancipation.

      https://www.historynewsnetwork.org/article/abraham-lincoln-never-believed-in-racial-equality

      Black abolitionist, Frederick Douglas didn't trust him. This is from the article:

      "Douglass had good reason to mistrust Lincoln. On December 1, 1862, one month before the scheduled issuing of an Emancipation Proclamation, the president offered the Confederacy another chance to return to the union and preserve slavery for the foreseeable future. In his annual message to congress, Lincoln recommended a constitutional amendment, which if it had passed, would have been the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution.

      "The amendment proposed gradual emancipation that would not be completed for another thirty-seven years, taking slavery in the United States into the twentieth century; compensation, not for the enslaved, but for the slaveholder; and the expulsion, supposedly voluntary but essentially a new Trail of Tears, of formerly enslaved Africans to the Caribbean, Central America, and Africa.

      "No wonder Frederick Douglass remained apprehensive as the date for emancipation approached. He recognized that 'the federal arm had been more than tolerant to that relict of barbarism. It had defended it inside the slave states ... it had returned slaves to their so-called owners; and had threatened that any attempt on the part of the slaves to gain their freedom by insurrection, or otherwise, would be put down with an iron hand...'"

      According to the author, the EP and Gettysburg Address were not positives since Lincoln didn't really believe that the government should be "of (all) the people." He opposed voting rights for all blacks. Here's how the author sums it up:

      "I suspect if this Abraham Lincoln had lived, presidential Reconstruction would not have differed much from the program promoted by his successor Andrew Johnson, and it probably would have received more support because of Lincoln’s political capital earned as a victorious war president. In this circumstance, the United States may never have seen the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments defining African Americans as citizens entitled to vote.

      "One hundred and fifty years after the Emancipation Proclamation and the Gettysburg Address, Americans still have to decide, how responsible Abraham Lincoln’s biases and indecision were for the failure to create a society where 'all men are created equal.''”

      Lincoln did change toward the end of his life. After the death of his son, he seems to have abandoned his atheism and began to believe in God although he never joined a church. To the end, however, he remained the pragmatist and was willing to violate human rights in order to preserve a false union whether it meant defending slavery or cheering his generals for committing war crimes against the Southern populace.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous 751:
      I concur. Lincoln created the political framework in which slavery was not only seen to be a great intrinsic national evil, but acted up to and including giving his own life to ensure this evil was utterly destroyed from the American soil.

      Emancipation Proclamation excerpt: "That on the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the Executive Government of the United States, including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom."

      The Gettysburg Address preface: "Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal."

      1837 Peoria speech, first term as Legislator: "I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong,"

      And Lincoln's own words, summarizing his intent in his second Inaugural Address - the best barometer to his true purpose in fighting this terrible civil war: "It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men's faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully. The Almighty has His own purposes. "Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh." If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether."

      There is no doubt in my mind Lincoln fought the civil war primarily as a way to end the evil of slavery, though there were obviously many issues beyond slavery driving the fetal discord.

      I may agree with the Mises Institute author that it is terribly unfortunate that our States-Rights form of government was replaced by the Federalist system of centralized power, much like the fall of Rome when Caesar crossed the Rubicon. But the fact remains that, as Lincoln said, great evil existed in our national heart that needed to be expunged, and according to the Providence of God, such evil in blood must be repaid by blood - "the last full measure" of it.

      Lincoln was a hero.
      He is worthy of American veneration.
      He made the case for the evil of slavery and its mother, racism. And he executed the war that cleansed us of it.

      Delete
  10. You said "Abraham Lincoln -- The "Great Emancipator" who never freed a single slave,"

    Then you said,
    "As for the Emancipation Proclamation (EP), it only freed slaves in the South where he his jurisdiction was not recognized"

    So he did free slaves. (That his jurisdiction was not recognized was the whole point of the war)

    He did follow up on the Emancipation by sheltering and protecting the Freed slaves (even if necessary by declaring them "contraband")

    Lincoln called the 13th amendment "the king's cure for all evils"

    From a Forbes article "As the war went on, however, Lincoln came to see constitutional amendment as the way to resolve the tension between slavery’s existence and the ideals of the Declaration of Independence. Lincoln also recognized the amendment as a way to shield federalism from more radical proposals that threatened it. When his work to support state emancipation efforts gained traction in places such as Maryland, Lincoln knew that popular opinion had moved sufficiently. In 1864, Lincoln caused a nationwide abolition amendment to be placed in his re-election platform and he proclaimed his victory a mandate in its favor. Lincoln’s leadership helped shape public opinion and he maintained his fidelity–and that of the U.S.–to the form and substance of the Constitution. Lincoln worked within the Constitution even while altering it."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He did never free a single slave. Most states when they ratified the Constitution, included a right to secede. Lincoln had NO more authority to free the slaves than an African chieftain. The U.S. came about through secession from Great Britain. West Virginia came about through secession from Virginia. The states had the right to secede. In fact, Jefferson Davis was never tried because of the fear that he would make the case for secession in court. A law professor at UVA published a book on this question in 2017. https://www.law.virginia.edu/news/201710/was-secession-legal In my opinion, Lincoln was a tyrant who authorized unlimited scorched earth warfare against the South and targeted civilians.

      Delete
    2. Mary Ann,

      The title of your post: “Historical Misrepresentation: How Many "Heroes" Were Really Villains...?”

      Me opinion: “Lincoln was a hero; worthy of American veneration”.

      Your opinion: Lincoln was a tyrant who targeted civilians and scorched the earth.

      It is interesting, in line with your theme, how two people can see the same facts and draw drastically different conclusions. Fascinating.

      But anyone looking at these facts can’t get around the core sin: one side defended institutional slavery, the other side gave their lives to end it. Slavery is an evil on par with abortion. And that institutional
      evil cannot coexist with good. Conflict between State actors, as with institutional abortion, is inevitable. Coexistence is not possible, ultimately. God will end it, even if we don’t. But we did. And for that, Lincoln deserves credit. Jefferson Davis was on the wrong side of that fight.

      War is hell, we should never forget it.

      But … institutional evil is also hell, an even greater hell quite frankly.

      In just war, violent chaos is the theme with true peace as its end.

      In institutional evil, there may be a current form of peace, but it is a terrifying kind of peace with destruction and violence as its end.

      And no one can deny - slavery was an evil cancer in our national heart that had to be excised. Conflict was inevitable.

      Delete
    3. ….excerpts from ‘The North, the South and Lincoln’s War Policies.’ By Adam S. Miller

      …..history (and social studies) has been used as a tool to garner, or we could even say, ‘evangelize’, children and adults to come to some type of mind-set, or some position……it’s function in American public school system has involved the conditioning of sentiments and social engineering…….the Christian and biblical world-view that history should be seen as the unfolding of the conflict between the Kingdom of God on earth (embodied in the one Church Christ founded) and the kingdom of Satan…….played out in the numerous social/political-ideological movements within nations and those between nations, as we as conflicts such as that which occurred in America in the mid-19th c., one of the most common strategies used by enemies of truth, in order to manipulate sentiments and loyalties, is to purposely suppress and omit from history text and works such information that contradicts and damages both the narrative and the façade put up by the Northern victors and the subsequent educational establishment.

      As a result, American for the most part have been cheated and blinded, from knowing what really occurred and who was in the right.
      This is precisely why the first casualty of war is truth.

      Delete
    4. We are in agreement, Aqua, on many things, but not on this.

      The issue is a lot more complicated, I think, and slavery is NOT on par with abortion. Is kidnapping and holding someone hostage as serious as murder?

      I certainly agree that slavery was a terrible evil, but so were the deaths of over 600,000 Americans in an unnecessary war. Slavery ended everywhere else by compensated emancipation, so the conflict of war was not "inevitable." If the South had been allowed to peacefully secede, slavery would have ended a bit more slowly, but without bloodshed. Many in the South opposed slavery as well. Stonewall Jackson was breaking Virginia law by teaching slaves to read. He purchased several slaves at their request with the agreement that they would work to pay off the fee and be freed. He was not the only one working to prepare the slaves for freedom. The Vatican at the time was sympathetic to the South.

      There was plenty of institutional evil in the North as well as in the South. Actually, the original slavers supporting the slave trade were New England sailors buying and bringing slaves from Africa. The canning industry in the midwest treated the Scandinavian immigrants like slaves. In fact, many lived in conditions far worse than the slaves in the South. Indentured servitude of the Irish often kept them in virtual slavery for years beyond their original agreements. Both North and South businesses exploited children particularly in the textile industry.

      We will have to agree to disagree on this. When a "solution" is so incredibly evil, one has to ask if it was, in fact, inevitable. I don't believe it was.

      I'm shutting off comments on this post.

      Delete
  11. Yet the vast majority of Americans most likely hold that nothing like those repressive Communist/Marxist regimes has ever occurred here in the U.S. In a different historical context what would Americans thin if one of their presidents was guilt of the following policies and actions:

    1. Misled and deceived his own elected officials and citizens in regard to a constitutional crisis,
    2. Regularly disregarded and breached the U. S. Constitution with policies and decisions,
    3. Illegally suspended the writ of ‘habeas corpus,
    4. Ordered military arrests and imprisonments of thousands of political critics and opponents without any charges of crimes or any due process,
    5. Censored telegraph communication,
    6. Had federal agents and others spy on fellow U. S. citizens
    7. Shut down more than three hundred newspapers,
    8. Arrested and imprisoned dozens of duly elected officials of certain states, including legislators, senators, majors, police, commissioners, without due process,
    9. Ordered federal troops to interfere with and influence state elections,
    10. Waged war without proper consent of Congress,
    11. Illegally created a new state,
    12. Arrested and deported an outspoken member of the Democratic opposition,
    13. Placed federal judges under house arrest,
    14. Issued an arrest warrant for the chief justice of the United States because he disagreed with his legal opinion,
    15. Approved of killing of civilians during war,
    16. Deceived his own military commanders and troops,
    17. Enticed and hired foreigners to kill fellow Americans,
    18. Arrested priests and ministers who failed to recite certain prescribed prayers for the President,
    19. Violated international law,
    20. Violated two separate legally binding armistices,
    21. Was admired by Karl Marx, and totalitarian leaders such as Otto von Bismarck, Vladimir Lenin, and Adolf Hitler for his policies of suppressing individual states’ rights and for the consolidation of powers over individual states.

    YET each and every one of these things apply to Abraham Lincoln ‘furthered and expanded the Revolution against the traditional Christian view and application of authority, and against the social-moral order that emanates from it. His despotic and tyrannical policies against civilians of both the North and South demonstrate this fact. Souther Americans were subjected to a barbarianism executed by Federal forces that , other than the horrific French Revolution, hadn’t been seen in centuries………

    ReplyDelete