Fr. Joseph Gill has an important article at Crisis Magazine about the Novus Ordo, The Novus Ordo and the Interior Life. Don't miss it!
In order for the Mass to be valid one important requirement is for the priest to intend to do what the Church intends. Think about that for a minute and then reflect on the many bishops and priests who turn the Mass into a sideshow. Did the priest who blessed the congregation with a guitar intend to do what the Church intends? Did the priests who dressed like Barney the purple dinosaur or Dracula intend to do what the Church intends? Did the bishops of the St. Gallen Mafia intend to do what the Church intends when they conspired together to put Francis on Peter's chair?
I've been to at least one Novus Ordo Mass that I was sure was invalid. My husband and I did not go to Communion. In retrospect we should have left. At another Sunday Mass in Detroit, the priest omitted the Creed. When I spoke to him after Mass with a big smile commenting on his enthusiasm, I added, "But you're not allowed to omit the Creed." He leaned over and said, "You're full of it, sweetheart!" Then he walked away and gave me the middle finger salute over his shoulder. Speaking the truth to a Pharisee is never appreciated.
Fr. Gill begins his article with this:
We’ve all been to our fair share of banal, cringe, or even disrespectful Novus Ordo Masses. As a priest who celebrates the Novus Ordo, I can see how easy it is in the New Rite to fall into those traps. It is evermore necessary, then, for a priest who celebrates the Novus Ordo to cultivate a rich interior life of union with Christ because this is the only antidote to the myriad of temptations to trivialize the liturgy.
This temptation does not exist in the TLM. By the very structure of the liturgy, it is nearly impossible to celebrate it irreverently. Of course, every priest should live in intimacy with God, but even a priest who doesn’t pray much can still celebrate the TLM in an objectively reverent way. The Latin Mass is structured in such a way as to eliminate the temptation for a priest to insert his personality, his ego, and his weaknesses into the liturgy.
One point father makes is that the priest facing the people offers a "particular temptation," one I've frequently seen, i.e., the showman priest:
...the manner of celebrating most Novus Ordo Masses versus populum provides a particular temptation to see oneself as the precise center of worship, rather than our Eucharistic Lord. There have certainly been times when celebrating Mass that the thought from the Evil One has struck me, “What did the people think about [how I said the Eucharistic prayer, how I preached, whether I appeared warm and friendly enough, etc.]?"
The Mass is certainly the greatest sacrifice on earth, but no "show," and the priest who makes it one commits a grave error if not a mortal sin. I once watched a video of a priest who, at the beginning of a nuptual Mass, sang a popular song as the bride entered the Church on the arm of her father. Talk about a "cringe-worthy" moment! Even from a human perspective this priest took the attention off the bride and placed it squarely on himself. Can one doubt he acts in the same way toward our Savior making himself the center of attention rather than Jesus Christ?
Fr. Gill stresses obedience and humility. Many of us have experienced liturgical violations at the Novus Ordo, perhaps without even realizing they violate the rubrics:
With so many options in the Novus Ordo, it can be easy to forget that many things are not given to us as choices. For example, “Good Morning” is not a choice in the liturgy. Nor is it necessary, or even allowed, to give an introduction to the Creed. A priest must have the obedient humility to stay within the bounds of what is actually allowed in the Novus Ordo and not go beyond those limits. He should have a burning desire to disappear beneath the vestments, that Christ alone may be revealed.I once had a spiritual director who was very conscious of this. When he said Mass his personality almost entirely disappeared. When I commented on the way he prayed the Mass and that particular thing, he replied that he wanted to disappear and let Christ be seen. What incredible humility and insight! He had a tremendous sense of humor and could easily have been a stand up comic in the lectern. But his goal was, "And I live, now not I; but Christ liveth in me." [Galatians 2:20] Needless to say, he gave wise and astute direction.
Read Fr. Gill's article. It's a testament and guide for making a deficient liturgy as reverent as possible and for the priest to act like a priest not a clown. No priest who followed his advice could use the Asperges as a joke smirking while soaking his favorites or slap handing children as he processed down the aisle at the end of Mass.
We need to pray for our priests. They aren't just hosts at the banquet or presiders or the first among equals. They minister the sacrifice and stand in the gap to offer atonement for our sins. WE NEED THEM! If we don't pray for our priests, for many and holy priests, we are derelict in our duty. Let us pray for them daily, offer sacrifices, make holy hours, etc. We need to encourage and thank our good priests and pray especially hard for "unfaithful and tepid" priests.
Did you pray for priest yesterday? Will you pray for them today? Let us be unfailing in our faithfulness to pray for our priests. Here are some prayers for priests. Let us be faithful intercessors for them.
O Jesus, Priest, Prophet, and King, have mercy on Your priests.
Our Lady, Queen of the Clergy, pray for our priests.
St. Joseph, Guardian of the Church, intercede for our priests.
All you guardian angels of priests, pray for them.
Thank you for a timely reminder.
ReplyDeleteDoes doing what the Church intends include belief in the Real Presence? Don't we know through anonymous polls that a significant percentage of N.O. priests do not?
ReplyDeleteI've never seen a statistic on priests, just Catholics in the pew. Can you find a source? Most of the NO priests I know definitely believe in the Real Presence.
DeleteCHRIST IS RISEN!
ReplyDeletePer Pope St. Pius V's "Quo Primum" of 1570, the Novus Ordo Mass, even if valid, is illicit. I avoid the NO like the plague.
PS Regarding that wicked man in vestments who flipped you off:
ReplyDeleteParadigm: Holy Orders requires three things: laying on of hands, invocation of the Holy Spirit, and unequivocal naming of the order being given.
Data Set: Unlike the Byzantine and Traditional Latin Episcopal Consecration Rites, Paul VI's Rite of 1969 only has two of the requisite elements. Thus the middle-fingerer in vestments, it being 57 years since 1969, is quite possibly still only a layman.
Our Lady of Guadalupe, aid us!
I just remember that priest in Arizona I think who who changed one word which was responsible for hundreds of invalid baptisms. Instead of the proper prayer I baptize you........ He said we baptize you. Makes me wonder just how many other sacraments are invalid because the priest adlibed. In one confession I had a NO priest that said I forgive you. I had to go to confession again because he should of said I absolve you which is the only acceptable word to validate the sacrament. Then in the mass "for you and for all" is actually a heresy because salvation is only open to Catholics, it should be "for you and for many" as its done in the Latin mass. I gave up trying to figure out what is valid and what is not in the Novus Ordo. I am not getting down on these priests for the most part I think they gave up a lot to do what they are doing and try to be sincere in their work. All I am saying is the church took away most of their tools. Think of the sanity just by going back to Latin. You can not adlib Latin so all the prayers would be identical to the ones 2000 years ago virtually eliminating any rogue sacrament.
ReplyDeleteI think of that horrible baptism 'error', too. How many people have been affected by that? Probably too many to calculate. It makes me sad, and it gives me encouragement to continue attending the SSPX chapels, as I have for many years. And I should add prayers for those whose faith has been damaged or destroyed by one priest ad-libbing.
DeleteThe doctrine that the validity of sacraments hinges on the intention of the priest has been around since Trent. Its one major thing Anglicans rejected until probably 1860 and now they have accepted what they used to call a "Romish" doctrine. They used to argue that if the intention of the priest is necessary to validity then a priest who is just going theough the motions for his paycheck is offering thousands of invalid euxharists and that the people can never know if even one eucharist they ever had was valid. Logically they were correct.
ReplyDeleteYou should do an article on how they have the people cry "away with Jesus, give us Barabas" at the Novus Ordo Good Friday mass and thus turn all the Novus Ordos spiritually into Jews.
ReplyDelete