In a comment on a previous
post, our editor, Mary Ann said referring to past generations, “Life was harder but it
was healthier. Hard work taught valuable lessons and kept kids out of trouble.”
WOW! That statement says a LOT.
What made life healthier?
Life was not nearly so infected with vulgar temptations on a nonstop
basis. Our government had not deprived
us of the “food for thought” we all need in our lives----symbols of faith such
as stone tablets with the Ten Commandments on them at our court houses,
prayer
in schools, songs in music classes that echoed what we heard in church, and
elected leaders who were not afraid to give credit to the Creator for the
blessings we have, knowing it is from the Almighty that all things come. Mothers were doing what mothers do best and
fathers were providing for and protecting them.
Kids were reared by their parents and not the state. They belonged to and were the responsibility
of their parents and not “the village.”
Those same parents had the best interest of the child in mind and not
the needs of society at large, run by men that see in youth only a future work
force or a passive electorate and not a little soul in need of salvation.
When it comes to “hard work and valuable lessons” one wonders
today if the word hard has lost most of its meaning. The Church teaches us that we should fast,
but that’s hard and most resist doing it, or engage in it very seldom, and only
when nearly forced to do so. We want
everything to be easy and consequently we have very little self-mastery. When you have trouble understanding or begin
to believe that doing what is hard is not worth the effort, you eventually look
for the very wide path of least resistance.
It is the wide well trodden road of the masses. It is the easy way out of everything.
I heard a 30 year old on the radio recently tell Dave Ramsay
that she had paid off $78,000 of debt in the last 24 months. She was a nurse who did the hard thing. She denied herself all luxury and pleasure
and worked three part-time jobs. By so
doing she rid herself of the burden of college loans and car payments which
continue to trouble most of her peers.
Without a doubt, this was a hard thing for her, but she dedicated
herself to the task because she understood that sometimes hard is the only way.
The valuable lesson, of course, is avoid temptation in the first
place and you won’t have to suffer the eventual consequences. A section on Mastery of Self can be found in
the Encyclical letter of Paul VI, Humanae Vitae, paragraphs 21:
“....To dominate instinct by means of one’s reason and free will
undoubtedly requires ascetical practices,…
Such discipline bestows upon family life fruits of serenity and peace,
and facilitates the solution of other problems…..
As I reread this papal letter again this morning, in preparation
for a Patrician’s meeting at church this evening, I was gob smacked at the
number of passages that speak the valuable
lessons we seem to have sadly forgotten.
Or did we simply set them aside because they were hard?
I have captured them here below.
As I read them, I could not help thinking of the horrible document Amoris
Laetitia, and how that Vatican publication and Humanae Vitae sadly do not reflect
the same message. See if you agree. Remember, truth never contradicts itself.
Humanae Vitae -- Of Human Life
Encyclical Letter of Paul VI, July
25, 1968
Paragraph
14) “In truth, if it is sometimes licit to
tolerate a lesser evil in order to avoid a greater evil or to promote a greater
good, (Pius XII, 1953) it is not licit, even for the gravest reasons, to do
evil so that good may follow therefrom, (Romans 3:8) that is, to make into the object of a
positive act of the will something which is intrinsically disorder, and
hence unworthy of the human person, even when the intention is to safeguard
or promote individual, family or social well-being.”
Paragraph
18)
“To tell the truth, the Church is not surprised to be made, like her divine
founder, a ‘sign of contradiction,’ (Luke 2:34) yet she does not because
of this cease to proclaim with humble firmness the entire moral law,
both natural and evangelical. Of such
laws the Church was not the author, nor consequently can she be their arbiter; she is the depositary and their
interpreter, without ever being able
to declare to be licit that which is not so by reason of its intimate and
unchangeable opposition to the true good of man. ………..Faithful to both
the teaching and the example of the Savior, she shows herself to be the
sincere and disinterested friend of men, whom she wishes to help, even during
their earthly sojourn, ‘to share as sons in the life of the living God, the
Father of all men.
III.
Pastoral Directives
Paragraph
19)
“The Church, in fact, cannot have a different conduct towards men than that
of the Redeemer. She knows their
weaknesses, has compassion on the crowd, receives sinners; but she cannot
renounce the teaching of the law which is, in reality, that law proper
to a human life restored to its original truth and conducted by the spirit of
God.” (Romans 8)
To
Priests
Paragraph
29) To diminish in no way the saving teaching of Christ
constitutes an eminent form of charity for souls. But this must ever be accompanied by patience
and goodness, such as the Lord himself gave example of in dealing with
men. Having come not to condemn but to
save, (John 3:17) He was intransigent with evil, but merciful toward
individuals.
In their difficulties, may married couples always
find, in the words and in the heart of a priest, the echo of the voice and the
love of the Redeemer.
And then speak
with confidence, beloved sons, fully convinced that the spirit of God,
while He assists the magisterium in proposing doctrine, illumines internally
the hearts of the faithful inviting them to give their assent.
No comments:
Post a Comment