The British mom who expressed concern about her son being placed in foster care with two homosexuals (See article.) has good reason to be concerned. Research shows that children raised in homosexual homes are 7X more likely to be homosexual. What's the surprise? Children learn what they live. Children of alcoholics are more likely to abuse alcohol. The same with drug abuse. So why the pretense that placing children with homosexuals has no impact on the development of their sexual identities? It's one more big, politically correct lie. Which leads one to ask, what is the real agenda of the child care industry that forces gay adoption and gay foster care? Certainly it is not the well-being of children.It is an abomination to place children with homosexual couples. The same culture that screamed bloody murder about child sex abuse by priests (while hiding the fact that it was mostly homosexual abuse) makes it a civil right for gays to adopt and do foster care. The dysfunctional child care industry is actively cooperating with the deviants by giving them a sort of preferred status. Political correctness meet reality. Homosexuality is bad for kids -- unless, of course, those placing children desire a homosexual outcome or play let's pretend to fit in with the politically correct popular culture that wants to deny the reality that homosexuality is disordered.
As far as homosexuals seeking to adopt and do foster care, I think "reproducing" is exactly what this is all about. True love engenders the desire to create new life. The perverted lust that masquerades as love engenders a distorted image of that human desire. Homosexuals can't "make a baby" except through recruitment. (Lesbians of course do it by enlisting the support of a third, opposite-sex person, and then pretend the baby is "theirs.") Historically, pederasty is a major means for homosexuals to reproduce themselves so to speak: introduce the young to deviant sexual practices, ply them with liquor, immerse them in pornography, sexually molest and sodomize them, and Voila! you have "given birth" to another homosexual like yourself. And then you pretend it's for the good of the child. "Sex before 8 or else it's too late, as the North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) motto goes."
The fact that the culture promotes and enables this is just one more indication of a society suffering from insanity. Unfortunately, the guys in the white coats are, for the most part, the biggest psychos of all. How else can you explain the American Psychiatric Association (APA) removing homosexuality from the list of psychological disorders in 1973 because of homosexual lobbying. It was a political, not a medical, decision. (Gay activist Franklin Komeny was instrumental in bullying and impacting the vote.) For awhile the psychos promoted the gay gene theory, but the other APA (American Psychological Association) in their latest brochure backs off from the gay gene theory. The homosexuals are pooh-poohing the change saying that the gay gene theory was never seriously accepted and what's all the fuss about the new language? It's just those nasty homophobes trying to use it to stop hate crimes legislation! Hey, whatever floats the gay loveboat.
But back to my main point. The fact is that, if research shows kids raised in gay families are more likely to be gay, it is pretty significant evidence that homosexuality is taught and chosen by its adherents. Those who truly care about children will want to see them placed in loving heterosexual adoptive and foster families where their sexual identities will not be distorted by perversion.
I don't know if it is a sad irony or merely a sick practical joke on your part that you would call your blog "THE TRUTH" while posting this anti-gay screed which contains so many lies and distortions that it is nothing short of offensive to any rational person.
ReplyDeleteIt makes sense kids are going to mimic what they see.
ReplyDeleteMary Ann Kreitzer,
ReplyDeleteGood Work!
Renowned psychiatrist maintained homosexuality is curable disorder..
Socarides said he had treated approximately 1,000 homosexuals in his practice that spanned four decades, a third of whom he said had successfully reverted to heterosexuality after treatment
Socarides, who was also a professor of clinical psychiatry at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, maintained his views even after the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from its list of mental diseases, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, in 1973.
A co-founder of the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality, Socarides maintained that the APA was a victim of “political assault” from homosexual advocacy groups. In his work, “Thought Reform and the Psychology of Homosexual Advocacy”, Socarides described what he called “jamming” – a technique utilized by homosexual advocates to instil doubt in the minds of pro-family leaders as to the correctness in their belief in the abnormality of homosexuality. This is done by oft-repeated but unfounded accusations of hateful speech and un-Christian-like conduct, and the equally unfounded assertion that pro-family positions are held by only an insignificant minority of society.
Socarides said he had treated approximately 1,000 homosexuals in his practice that spanned four decades, a third of whom he said had successfully reverted to heterosexuality after treatment. He described the syndrome as one born from an overbearing mother and an absent father; he utilized a psychoanalysis approach to treatment.
Socarides admitted his own failure for his son who, openly homosexual, became a Clinton administration Whitehouse advisor on homosexual issues. He said that he had failed his son after divorcing his first wife by not spending enough time with him.
Read a sample of Dr. Socarides work at:
http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/narth/1995papers/socar...
For anyone to post a negative opinion under the name of "Anonymous" gives very little credence to their comment. If you want to disagree, at least put a face (or at least a name) to the remarks! Otherwise, you appear biased and cowardly...
ReplyDeleteFor myself, I agree with you, MaryAnn, 100% ~ like the other "Anon." poster says, children learn what they witness...and believe me, as the mother of eight children, I can attest to this fact of life in a BIG way!
I think your post is well-thought-out and well-written. Don't let the nay-sayers sway you, dear...you have God on your side in this one! ;)
Take care...
Let me say I think this study is pure baloney. I am no expert in this area, but spoke to one.
ReplyDeleteHe was a priest who ran a large Courage program for many years.
I wanted to know how successful it was and the trends he saw.
I was not prepared for what he told me. In short, he told me very, very, very few folks turn from the lifestyle. In other words, Courage was almost a complete failure. He told me, people today are too attached to their sins. The bible says homosexuality is a sign of having been abandoned by God. That is,
a punishment from God, and such partakers become blinded by lust for the act. I doubt anyone truly reverts out of that lifestyle.
Perhaps some publicy renounce it and get married, but Larry Craig and Ted Haggerd were also married and anti homo in public.
I just avoid such persons and insist my family avoid such persons.
I'm bemused, Anonymous.
ReplyDeleteYou say, "I think this study is pure baloney" and then go on to support it. The very fact that people would be "attached to their sins" is precisely the reason they would be likely to scandalize and lead their adopted/fostered children to join them.
So why do you think the study is "baloney." Everything you said supported the likelikhood it is right on target, especially your last comment. "I insist my family avoid such persons." Why? Unless you believe they can corrupt the morals of others.