Doctors Under Attack if They Won't Tow the Party Line and Push the Jab

The shameless COVID Machine slanders every doctor who points out the danger of the gene therapy jab that has killed and injured thousands. The same Biden/Fauci machine continues to suppress the truth about effective therapies like ivermectin and hydroxychoroquine that could have saved a large percentage of those who unnecessarily died. Those promoting the government lies, use lawsuits and slander to attack the prominent physicians who won't jump on the snake oil bandwagon. Let's look at some of the slandered doctors, first Dr. Peter McCullough:

Lawsuit against Prominent Physician Sends Wrong Message, States the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)

Here's what the AAPS says about this respectable doctor and the malicious lawsuit:

• Dr. Peter McCullough served in his prior position for many years with distinction. This is an historical fact, which is on the public record and cited in his hundreds of peer-reviewed publications. Such journals require disclosure of affiliations.

• Dr. McCullough advocates use of FDA-approved repurposed drugs such as hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, budesonide, and colchicine in sequential multidrug regimens appropriate to the three stages of the disease. He has also expressed concerns about the risks and benefits of COVID-19 vaccines and stated that many patients may elect not to take them.

• Some at his former employer apparently disagree with these well-supported medical opinions, which are the context for its lawsuit.

• The lesson for physicians is that expressing a view contrary to corporate policy may result in losing their job and facing costly litigation.

• The lesson for patients is that practitioners employed by a health system are obligated to follow corporate policy or risk unemployment or worse.

• According to patients and clinicians who contact AAPS, hospitalized patients will almost always be denied treatment with hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, high-dose vitamin C or vitamin D, or other treatments not in the highly restrictive National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines. The NIH holds that there are no adequate randomized controlled trials, though there is extensive evidence of benefits in hundreds of publications, and the treatments are widely used in many countries.

• Additionally, patients may not receive any advice that might cause “vaccine hesitancy.” Reported adverse effects such as heart failure or paralysis are stated to be “extremely rare,” “usually mild,” or likely coincidental and unrelated to the vaccine.

• The prospect of retaliatory firing or lawsuits by a former employer inevitably has a chilling effect on open discussion, individualized patient care, and scientific advances.

Dr. McCullough is not the only one. Any doctor who raises questions or discusses the risks of the jab is accused of "spreading misinformation." Many of these doctors, like former vice president at Pfizer, Dr. Michael Yeadon, and "baby whisperer" Dr. Bob Hamilton have long and honored careers as experts in a their fields. They are being censored, de-platformed, slandered, and cancelled. 

Never in the history of the world has an experimental drug been mandated for entire populations under the threat of vaccine apartheid. But we see the tyranny happening before our eyes and many Americans have swallowed the bait - hook, line, and sinker. Malicious lawsuits, deliberate slander, it's all happening to these ethical men and women who just want to follow the Hippocratic oath and "first do no harm." 

Why are world governments so determined to stick it to every person on the planet? And what will we see from this experimental drug therapy down the road?