Search This Blog

Showing posts with label estrogen pollution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label estrogen pollution. Show all posts

Friday, May 27, 2022

The Normalization of Gay Marriage and Gay Ideology!

National Review has unconditionally surrendered to same-sex ‘marriage’ 

Let us pray to have
a heart for poor sinners!
I found this article truly alarming because it emphasizes how the normalization of "gay" ideology is increasingly infecting conservatism. I'm familiar with a number of the conservative "gays" mentioned in the article. Last year I listened to Andy Gno's book on Antifa. These are men and women who share many of my concerns and beliefs. And yet..... 

When acceptance of same sex marriage is mainstream and "normal" we are truly on a rapid descent into the abyss. Remember that this sin is one that "cries to heaven for vengeance." Not only that, but many of these individuals with disordered passions are rearing children. What will that do to the future of our world?

St. Jacinta of Fatima had a heart for "poor sinners" and I'm sympathetic to these same-sex attracted individuals for a number of reasons, but one stands out! I wonder how much environmental factors are contributing to the unmasculating of boys and their sense that they are in the wrong body. Why do more and more young boys feel like girls. 

Saturday, January 27, 2018

Don't Eat That Sandwich....It's a Crime Against the Planet!

Really! Did you know that certain types of sandwiches cause global warming? After all, the scientists can't be wrong and some doing research at the University of Manchester say so. Well, no doubt every liberal in Congress will immediately dump the sandwiches and start eating sprouts wrapped in arugula (brought from home and carried in a reusable pouch). Oh, and by the way, what about the environmental impact of processing hops and corn to make alcohol? Really! When are they going to ban alcohol because of its global impact?

Friday, April 1, 2011

Planned Parenthood and Susan G. Komen: the bizarre connection

Sooooo.....Planned Parenthood has no mammogram machines and has no way to contribute to the "breast health" of women AT ALL other than writing on a slip of paper where they can go for mammograms. But Susan G. Komen is pumping money into Planned Parenthood for mammograms. Now where do you think that money is going? And why exactly is Komen giving it? The sweetheart deal between these two organizations needs some investigation.

All those women who think they are "walking for the cure" may actually be contributing to a rising rate in breast cancer because of the links between "the pill" and abortion and the disease. Planned Parenthood pollutes women's bodies.... but not only women's bodies. Estrogen is polluting the groundwater and our lakes and streams. Where is the EPA when it comes to the decimation of fish populations from estrogen poison not to mention the contamination of our milk supply? If your city gets its water from a river or lake near a sewage treatment plant you can almost guarantee that you are drinking birth control chemicals as well as an entire pharmacopia. It sure makes me glad we have a 200 foot well!

Komen Planned Parenthood Grants Questioned After Mammogram Expose’
Planned Parenthood Falsely Uses Mammograms to Defend Tax-Funding
A poison Pill: Human contraceptives are bad for fish
Estrogen Pollution: A Potential Human-Health Disaster

Friday, March 13, 2009

Breast Cancer: the Pill's Deadly Legacy

I'm a breast cancer survivor. When I was 39 I found a lump during a self-exam. To make a long story short I had surgery (modified radical mastectomy) and chemotherapy. And here I am about twenty years later to tell the tale. Because I had absolutely no risk factors and was nursing a little one at the time, my doctor presumed it was a clogged milk duct and didn't order a mammogram. When it didn't go away and seemed to be getting larger I went for one. (Always question your doctor - better safe than sorry.)

At the time (1986) very little was known about breast cancer in pre-menopausal women; it was still relatively uncommon. The cancer hadn't spread to the lymph nodes and the surgeon thought I was free and clear. The oncologist recommended otherwise. I chose chemo, not because there were studies showing it was effective in younger women, but because he said, "You get one chance to hit cancer hard and your children are very young." Ten years later studies showed a longer survival rate for the surgery + chemo combo.

Over the years I've noticed cancer attack younger and younger women? Why? Why has breast cancer become not only a disease of middle-aged and older women, but is hitting women in their 30s, their 20s, and even teenagers. One answer is the birth control pill. A study by the Mayo Clinic found the pill is particularly dangerous for women who have never had a baby - a target group for organizations like Planned Parenthood.

One of my daughters has a friend whose mom put her on the pill when she was about fourteen. When she hit 25 she had a very aggressive cancer in both breasts. It's affected her decisions about having children. Could she leave her husband with little ones to raise alone?

Another risk factor is in the food we eat and the water we drink. Increasingly, fish are turning up in our rivers with confused sexual organs, male fish carrying eggs for example. While estrogen from the pill excreted in human waste is one factor, hormones fed to farm animals is another. Waste products and farm runoff pollute rivers, wells, and reservoirs. In my own county (Shenandoah in Virginia) the river is polluted with birth control drugs. And it's not just affecting women. Increasingly, little boys are born with undescended testicles and low sperm counts caused by a variety of chemical pollutants including birth control drugs.

But is there anyone out there raising the alarm? Darn few! The environmentalists who continually lobby Congress with scares that often prove baseless, apparently have little interest in demanding action over a danger that threatens us every time we turn on a faucet. But then it's more politically correct to penalize an oil company over a localized spill than to go after a behemoth like Planned Parenthood and their pharmaceutical allies who are polluting millions of women's bodies directly and many millions of others through what I'll euphemistically call the "yellow oil" spill.

Women need to hear the warning loud and clear. The pill may not kill you today or next week, but the breast cancer you get because of it may very well kill you in a few years. Even back in the 80s they knew there was a link. My doctor told me it was a good thing I never took the pill because I would probably have had cancer at 29 instead of 39.

One last note. There is a new, very aggressive kind of cancer called inflammatory breast cancer or IBC. Its symptoms are very different from traditional breast cancer. Watch this video warning. Knowledge is a woman's best protection against breast cancer.