Now that Congress has done the deed and approved open "gays" in the military, I thought I'd repost a few blog entries from the past. Prior to this latest foray into social experimentation, the military already had a significant problem with male on male sex abuse (about 7% of the reported cases of physical abuse - not counting verbal harrassment). We can expect things to get worse. Why wouldn't they? What fun those open showers in the barracks will be for the gay guys ogling "the junk" on their fellow soldiers and making lewd comments. Ooo-la-la! And then there are the less endowed guys.
Does anyone really think most men will report sexual harrassment? And if they did, who do you think would be targeted in the new politically correct scenario of he-said, he-said?
My greatest fear is the likelihood that scores will be settled in battle zones with a little "(un)friendly fire." Remember the persecuted TSA agent who finally used his baton on a co-worker? Consider the firepower being carried by 18-year-old kids. Let's face it, when alternatives are limited, some folks take things into their own hands. John F. Kennedy recognized the truth of that when he said, "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." We keep hearing the elites at the top saying that the guys in the trenches wanted repeal of the ban, but 63% percent of military families surveyed said, "No!" Did anyone listen to those most affected by the change? As usual, no! We fought a revolution against a king who would not listen to his subjects. Who's listening now? We're all serfs and wage slaves to the elites in the White House and on Capitol Hill.
God help our poor country.
Article with links to study on homosexual abuse in the military
Retired Navy Captain tells why homosexuals don't belong in the military
Search This Blog
Showing posts with label DADT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DADT. Show all posts
Sunday, December 19, 2010
Saturday, December 18, 2010
Sodomizing the Military: What Next?
Well Congress did it. They decided that the military should be the venue for another social experiment. They say it won't hurt unit cohesiveness and that gays can now stand up tall and proud and be "who they are." Hey, we already know who they are. They are people with a disordered attraction. There are lots of disordered attractions out there, but most people don't demand that the culture applaud them. Is there an out and proud movement for bullimics? Not that I've heard. How about alcoholics? No, there are 12-step programs to help them get over their addictions.
What about other disordered lusts? Is there a movement for necrophiliacs? (For the unitiated, those are folks who like doing it with dead bodies.) Then there are those who prefer their sex across species? Let's hear it for out and proud animal lovers! It gives new meaning, don't you know, to the Captain and Tennille's song, Muskrat Love.
What about other disordered lusts? Is there a movement for necrophiliacs? (For the unitiated, those are folks who like doing it with dead bodies.) Then there are those who prefer their sex across species? Let's hear it for out and proud animal lovers! It gives new meaning, don't you know, to the Captain and Tennille's song, Muskrat Love.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)