Administration Lied About Military Attitudes on "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"

Is anyone surprised to find that the administration lies to get their desired results? The Navy is being sued over false data showing that most military favored DADT (Don't Ask, Don't Tell). It simply wasn't true and anyone with an iota of common sense suspected the books were cooked. Check out the pot: Navy Sued Over Manipulation of 'Gay' Data. 

Sodomizing the Military: What Next?

Well Congress did it. They decided that the military should be the venue for another social experiment. They say it won't hurt unit cohesiveness and that gays can now stand up tall and proud and be "who they are." Hey, we already know who they are. They are people with a disordered attraction. There are lots of disordered attractions out there, but most people don't demand that the culture applaud them. Is there an out and proud movement for bullimics? Not that I've heard. How about alcoholics? No, there are 12-step programs to help them get over their addictions.

What about other disordered lusts? Is there a movement for necrophiliacs? (For the unitiated, those are folks who like doing it with dead bodies.) Then there are those who prefer their sex across species? Let's hear it for out and proud animal lovers! It gives new meaning, don't you know, to the Captain and Tennille's song, Muskrat Love.

House Votes to Repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"

"Judas went out, and it was night."

Last night the House voted to repeal the "don't ask, don't tell" policy allowing those with perverted sexual attractions to serve openly in the military. (Go here... )What will this do to the military? For one thing, it will sure make me discourage any of my relatives from serving.

Can you imagine being an 18-year-old male recruit sleeping in a barracks with homosexuals who think your cute? With open showers? How can you fail to notice that you turn on the guy at the shower head next to you? Will the girls and the heterosexual men now be sharing showers as well? If not, why not? The lunacy of homosexuals in the military makes my head swim. It converts the military into one more politically correct entity that advances the gay agenda.

And then there is the dilemma of the recruit who is being sexually approached by the gay guys. Will he be able to complain? What if it's his sargeant making double entendre statements? Will he be labeled homophobic if he dares to show the normal reaction of disgust?

Our society has created a protected class based on a preference for perverted and disgusting sexual behavior. That it is permeating all sectors of society as a "civil right" shows just how depraved the culture has become. Tolerance for the intolerable is no virtue. Lust is one of the seven deadly sins and the fact of lusting after someone of the same sex just makes it perverted and deadly in more ways than one.

Will We "Celebrate" Memorial Day by Seeing the Military Approve Homosexuality?

If that happens it will be a tragedy. The Pentagon's own data indicates that homosexuals in the military commit a disproportionate number of sexual assaults. Here are just a few examples from a report by the Family Research Council:

36-year-old Marine Sgt. Sean D. Habian used both alcohol and homosexual pornography in the course of assaulting a 21-year-old Lance Corporal.


Marine Sgt. Steven G. Carlson, a military police instructor, took advantage of his position to exploit his students, inviting them to social events, plying them with alcohol, and playing games like “truth or dare” to identify who might be receptive to homosexual activity. One of his victims “testified that the appellant’s acts shocked him, he froze, and was scared.”

Homosexual activists are fond of saying that the military cannot afford to lose the specialized skills that some homosexual service members have-such as translators and linguists. Air Force Sgt. Eric P. Marcum was a Persian-Farsi linguist-but also was charged with forcible sodomy against a male Senior Airman who “testified that Appellant’s actions made him scared, angry, and uncomfortable.”

Air Force Major Rickie J. Bellanger was charged with sexually abusing two minor boys-one of whom had begun corresponding with Maj. Bellanger when he was in the fifth grade.

Read the Executive Summary here and the full study here.

Military cohesiveness, discipline, and health are all threatened by homosexuals in the ranks. Not only should "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" not be repealed; homosexuals should be banned from serving in the military as they were in the past. No particular kind of deviant behavior deserves to be thought of as a civil right. That it more and more is just indicates the death of common sense in our culture. The likelihood of its restoration seems remote since a generation of young people have been brainwashed to accept deviant behavior as normal. But the impact on the military is disasterous, especially in a war where you may have to worry not only about the enemy in front of you, but the one in back as well.

The Destruction of the U.S. Military

Political correctness will be the death of us. In the military, the latest pc exercise is dropping Don't ask/Don't tell and letting gays and lesbians serve openly in the military. It's a bad idea and has the potential to further devastate our ability to protect ourselves in a dangerous world. Only the Marine Corps is holding out. The Navy is the worst, I'm sad to say since I have a nephew serving and my dad was career Navy and a Pearl Harbor survivor. What would Daddy say if he were alive to see these clowns in stars and bars talking about how diversity is so good for us. Tell that to the families of the dead at Fort Hood.

But like every other aspect of our culture, the military reflects the same corruption. Someone should remind these clowns that messing with the Roman legions by admitting barbarian tribesmen was one of the reasons the Roman Empire collapsed. Between the hedonism of our ruling elites; the destruction of our institutions; and the infiltration of gays, lesbians, and Islamic militants into the military; and the bread and circuses of our welfare/lust-addicted society we are well on the way to repeating the folly of Rome. Ah, but we do it with such flare. Rome's emperors could never compete with the first couple. They didn't have teleprompters, trainers, and a worshiping media to spin the news.

Not Your Father's Army


Don't Touch Don't Ask, Don't Tell

Top military officer backs repeal of 'don't ask, don't tell'

Don’t Ask Don’t Tell: The Battle Was Lost Long Ago

Deep-Sixing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Policy Will Hurt Military

Obama is as busy promoting his liberal agenda as termites in the deep south eating the foundations of wooden houses. Babies in the womb have been a major target, but now he's turning to their older brothers and sisters in the military. Obama promised during the campaign and again in January that he plans to deep-six the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy in the military and allow homosexuals to serve openly. Consider the impact in an environment where soldiers share open shower facilities, "hot bunk" on subs and on ships, and experience the other stresses of living in close quarters. Will this increase cohesiveness in the military? Not hardly. And what will be the impact on the all-volunteer force?

According to a Military Times Poll, 58% of active duty subscribers were opposed to a change in the policy. Ten percent said they would not re-enlist and another 14% said it would impact their decision. Can the military afford to eliminate 24% of its recruits. How many would not sign up at all?

Elaine Donnelly writing for The Tank, National Review's military blog, opines that "Corollary programs to make the new policy 'work' would include professional 'diversity training' to enforce acceptance, and 'zero tolerance' of anyone who disagrees. Dissenters would face discipline and be denied promotions, which would end their military careers. Incidents of misconduct would increase threefold, to include male/male and female/female misconduct that undermines discipline and demoralizes the troops. These results would harm recruiting and retention, and effectively destroy the volunteer force."

Is Donnelly right? Is finding out the hard way worth the risk?