Editor's Note: The Queen of Hearts, aka Judge Kolleen Kollar Kotelly, is presiding over the show trial of the Garland 9 arrested for standing between unborn children and their killers. In these crazy times, murdering the innocent has become a protected civil right. Defending them is a crime deserving of a long prison term. If you've never read about the genocide in the Vendee, this would be a good time to study it, because history repeats itself. The peasants of the Vendee rose up against the evil Constitutional government in France as it targeted the innocent for execution. Today the knives are busy again against the innocent in the womb. Read the report below on the show trial in progress in D.C. Judge KKK is channeling the Communist and Fascists judge of WW II and the cold war. There is nothing new under the sun and, as George Santayana said, "Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it!"
D.C. Show Trial
The trial part of the DC Show Trial was finally launched on 16 August, which Judge Kolleen Kollar Kotelly began by elucidating that nothing relevant will be allowed during its course, as revealed regarding specifics in the previous post covering this mockery; to wit, that no mention by the defense can be made that:
- the defendants' conduct was protected by the First Amendment or any other provision of the Constitution;
- that their conduct was the lesser of two evils, or any mention of the necessity or third party defenses;
- that they have been selectively or vindictively prosecuted (goodness no!);
- of the consequences of the conviction, namely 11 years imprisonment for a 2 hour sit-in;
- of the unlawful 'medical' procedures conducted at Santangelo's extermination camp;
- or of the murdered children recovered from his SurgiCenter, or Lauren Handy's home where she brought them (brutal photos of these, among State supported Santangelo's many victims, in following link);
- or any use of inflammatory language (from the defense side anyhow) that is not quoted from documentary evidence, including, but not limited to: infanticide, abortionist, innocent lives, etc.;
- or use of any argument otherwise related to jury nullification, including, but not limited to: that conviction would be unjust, that the charges are immoral, that defendants' conduct complies with natural law; etc.;
- or using any argument of a defendant's prior good acts that might lead the jury to acquit because of those acts.
Following the judicial drivel, the prosecution led with its opening arguments, passionately denouncing the rescuers, Lauren Handy in particular, for seeking to prevent SurgiCenter's hitmen (paraphrase) from achieving their grisly profits; & Garland9's Jonathan Darnel for filming that magnificent effort (see following links).
https://m.facebook.com/DCAreaAntiAbortionAdvocacy/videos/rescue-at-washington-abortion-clinic/420631786000084/
https://m.facebook.com/DCAreaAntiAbortionAdvocacy/videos/police-arrest-and-remove-rescuers/2463812343913040
Lauren Handy's attorney Martin Cannon was the first defense lawyer to address the PlannedParenthood 'jury,' during which he spoke of her life, how she got involved with defending the innocent, initially due to a video she saw of 'babies being born alive and left to die. That experience informed and motivated everything Lauren Handy did.'
John Hinshaw's attorney Alfred Guillame followed with a standard recitation outlining the jury's responsibility to focus on the facts of the case, & their implications.
Then Heather Adoni's lawyer Robert Dunn spoke, noting 'this is a story about a lady who feels called by her conscience to help expectant mothers,' inside of whom 'there is a human being with a heartbeat & brain waves.' According to my source he made 'a beautiful & inspiring' presentation, in the teeth of numerous prosecutorial objections, always of course sustained by our bloodthirstyhonor.
Will Goodman's Thomas More Society attorney (also Cannon, maybe Dunn) Howard Walsh then stressed the standard defense position that a client is presumed innocent unless & until prosecution can demonstrate otherwise beyond a reasonable doubt. His effort to note various legal distinctions, such as between blocking & merely standing, were regularly interrupted by KK, but despite a diarrhetic stream of sustained prosecutorial objections, Dunn nonetheless succeeded in portraying Goodman's character. Paying homage to the fine history of activists comparable to Goodman, Dunn pointed out that, like them, 'human rights is his living,' & thus why he sought to disrupt 'the terrible things happening' at Santangelo's extermination camp.
These defense contributions were apparently too vivid for KK's hostility to reality, so that, following Dunn's offering, she again went off on a visibly angry & ridiculous tangent.
'Use the defendants' names, I don't want you to be friendly with them' she hollered, presumably expecting their attorneys to be as hostile to mass murder opponents as she is. Mz. KK was also unhappy with the recurrent defense implications that FACE & federal obstruction laws are neither just nor constitutionally valid. Stop acting like this case 'should have been charged locally,' she sputteringly insisted.
After this (latest) tirade, Rosemary 'Herb' Geraghty's attorney John Kiyonaga, against KK's preposterous rules forbidding mention of defendants' good character or deeds, & thus again over numerous sustained objections, sought nonetheless to point out Geraghty has long been devoted publicly 'to non-violence,' which is why she is 'a vegan' who would 'not impose on anyone.'
Will here note that while RHG did help to organize it, she was not directly involved in the rescue qua; & thus her attorney pointed out she 'did not chain' herself to anything, 'was not a part of any barricade,' left when the police asked her to, & was instead at the SurgiCenter 'gently to convince mothers that the clinic was a dangerous place.'
That Geraghty thought so, apart from that of course it savagely is, nonetheless provoked an objection, dutifully sustained.
So Kiyonaga closed by observing his client went there to convey her 'beliefs to the mothers,' assuring 'they understood there were other options available,' & did not impose her 'will on anyone.'
None of which will free her, alas, because she has refused to blink from her support for her confreres in the Garland9.
The day had not ended. Next came witnesses.
To be continued
Also: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pro-life-leader-accuses-biden-doj-of-weaponizing-face-act-to-cover-up-infanticide/
in my experience vegans are more likely to be proabortion
ReplyDelete