![]() |
| Put on the armor of God and HOLD YOUR GROUND! |
Search This Blog
Showing posts with label After the Ball. Show all posts
Showing posts with label After the Ball. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 14, 2018
Nabi Sayeth: Catholics are Called to Join the Counterculture against the Homosexual Movement!
Thursday, August 23, 2018
Speaking with Forked Tongue: Fr. Peter Daly and Homosexual Propaganda!
![]() |
| Fr. Peter Daly, gay propagandist! |
The homosexual propaganda machine is operating at full tilt these days as evidenced by many articles where semantic gymnastics are used to deceive. I read one today by Fr. Peter Daly, a retired priest of the Archdiocese of Washington, D.C. and a columnist for the not-really-Catholic Reporter, aka "the fishwrap." I include that bit of information because it tells you from the outset that Daly is not an orthodox priest. Orthodoxy is banned from the "fishwrap," especially orthodoxy about the disorder of homosexuality.
The article, Confrontation time: Cardinal McCarrick and me in 2002, sounds great. And how nobly it paints Fr. Daly, a priest who almost single-handedly had the courage to boldly confront McCarrick about the sex abuse crisis. (Drum roll and trumpet fanfare!) It happened, as he tells it, at a priests' meeting after McCarrick returned from Rome where the bishops were called to discuss the abuse crisis with Pope John Paul II. Here's Fr. Daly's description of the event:
Saturday, September 16, 2017
Fr. Martin Misrepresents His Book as Having "Canonical Approval"...
![]() |
| Is your parish promoting Fr. Martin's book like this parish in Hampton, VA? |
Defending his book, Building a Bridge (2017), Jesuit Father James Martin claims that its consistency with Church teaching is attested to by (A) his own good standing as a priest, and (B) the canonical approval the book received from his Jesuit superior.
Martin’s first claim, that he is a priest in good standing, is neither contested nor relevant to the question of whether his book is doctrinally sound or pastorally trustworthy.
Martin’s second claim, that his book enjoys canonical approval, requires some context before one can appreciate what that means—and doesn’t mean. Read more here.
Peters sums up:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


