There was a time when I totally trusted Phil Lawler's take on things. I read several of his books with pen in hand and made margin notes to return to later. A trusted source, he was my regular go-to source as I slogged along in the Church crisis. So I was truly disappointed in his recent articles on the SSPX situation and upcoming consecrations. I was staggered when he said there was no state of necessity since it's up to Rome to make that decision. Really? If I see a child about to run into the street and be hit by a car, I'm not waiting for a policeman to tell me I can jaywalk. I also disagree with Lawler's interpretation of Fr. Pagliarani's statement that “In an ordinary parish, the faithful no longer find the necessary means to ensure their eternal salvation.” Perhaps that statement was overbroad, but certainly not untrue.
I returned to the Traditional Latin Mass during COVID. What happened in "ordinary parishes" during that disgraceful episode? Closed churches, priests violating canon law by demanding parishioners receive Communion on the hand, condemnation of those who didn't mask. Seriously... those things didn't endanger parishioners' "necessary means to ensure their salvation?"
I was shocked at the lack of charity in my own parish! And how many Catholics stopped going to Church since their shepherds didn't think Sunday Mass was all that important. If they did, they would have fought government overreach. The liquor stores and abortion facilities were more important than the churches, and the bishops bent the knee. They caved to a government that thinks religion is unnecessary. The bishops apparently agreed.
For decades I attended daily and Sunday Masses according to the Novus Ordo. Sometimes I wonder how I managed to stay Catholic. I had a pastor who left to marry a mom I carpooled with, another who had someone coming to give him a massage every week and decked the rectory out with fancy furniture and a marble fireplace. I had pastors who were telling people in confession they could follow their consciences on contraception. A couple in charge of RCIA in one parish made a point of avoiding anything controversial that might make someone rethink entering the Church. The challenging doctrines, like contraception, abortion, Marian theology, etc. were dropped down the memory hole.
What world does Phil Lawler live in? Whenever my husband and I travel, I check all the local parishes to make sure we don't end up at the gong show. Once in Newport News I failed to do it, and we attended a Mass we were sure was invalid. The priest invented all kinds of prayers, a never-before-heard canon read from a pamphlet, and women participating in the fraction. At another traveling Mass in Detroit, the priest skipped the Creed and played showman on the altar. When I gently challenged him after Mass he walked away giving me the finger over his shoulder.
How many parishes are like those? Most of the German bishops are so bad I wonder how many Masses there are actually valid. And France doesn't seem to be doing much better. The teaching in Ireland is apparently so bad the people voted for abortion, the only country where the people actively chose murder of the innocent. The snakes have returned to the country! Italy recently had about a dozen bishops involved in LGBTQ vigils. What are the "ordinary" parishes like there?
But we don't need to look any farther than home to see the crisis. Is Cupich in Chicago preaching the faith? Are his priests? How about John Stowe of Lexington, a sodomy promoter who took a knee for BLM at an El Paso protest? D.C. and Baltimore are in a terrible state as well. And how many "all are welcome" parishes decorate the sanctuary with rainbow flags and participate in pride events? I won't even address all the political parishes that turn the prayers of the faithful into woke litanies about climate change and defending the invasion at the border.
Do I know of any Novus Ordo parishes where faithful priests offer reverent liturgies and defend the faith? Yes, but I would call them far from ordinary. I always feel like I've found a four leaf clover when I discover one outside Arlington which is still a relatively orthodox diocesem because we have so many faithful priests. But since I returned to the TLM I have a hard time going to NO Masses. I'm too aware of the deficiencies -- meal prayers substituted for the Offertory, multiple choices that make every Mass a source of diversity instead of unity. Hybrid, dual language Masses that nobody likes, little solid instruction. It's just too depressing.
With regard to Fr. Pagliarani's statement, you can quibble over the numbers, but the fact is that the situation in the Church is dismal everywhere. That's what is "ordinary." And all the statistics indicate that the faith, indeed, is being lost. The recent little jump was magnified with glee, but the overall statistics continue the downward trend.
Please, Phil, stop with the criticism of the SSPX. When I saw the headline "What if I'm Wrong?" I hoped you were going to defend the Society. Instead it was another opportunity to criticize the consecrations. But the reality is that the only reason we still have the traditional Mass and sacraments is because of Archbishop Lefebvre. It was his 1988 consecrations that gave the Society the ability to continue. And who knows if the SSPX will end up being the lifeline if and when the Vatican and hostile bishops cancel the Ecclesia Dei groups. How many dioceses have already expelled them?
Let's face it. Rome appears to want the total dissolution of the past as if there was no Church before Vatican II. Those who say Rome has created a "new" church, even the "ape" of the Church have plenty of evidence to defend their thesis. What if they're right, Phil?
With all that said, the "necessity" for us is prayer and sacrifice for Holy Mother Church and the pope. And we also need to pray for our own perseverance. The answer always begins with the individual. We need to do all we can to conform our wills to God's will and remain faithful. That will bring about the end of every crisis. It also guarantees that when Christ returns, He will find faith on the earth!
Make us saints, Lord!
This is an important topic that must be continually investigated and discerned to keep the True Catholic Faith. Thank you for your presentation. I follow your thinking. Yet, there is division everywhere on many topics.
ReplyDeleteWhat would you do if you have no access to the SSPX, TLM, etc. in your area? How would you receive the sacraments? How would you observe your Sunday obligation? Would your course of action bring peace to your soul?
Agree 100%. Lawler's take on the SSPX at this critical time is so misguided I now have no interest in following him. I cannot judge his heart, but it seems he's a Company Man who is incapable of not supporting the official Company line.
ReplyDeleteExcellent post. Tells it like it is. This idea pushed by Lawler, the Mirus clan, and other "conservative catholics" is just the typical defending the Vatican II revolution at all costs that has been going on for decades.
ReplyDeleteFor them, the SSPX is the enemy, period. Even when the Vatican has been friendly toward the SSPX on many occasions... Nope. Not going along with that. Their mindset is the same as the typical anti-Catholic Protestant. NO amount of evidence will ever be enough to convince them that the SSPX is anything but an evil "schismatic" group that must be bashed at every opportunity.
If Chicago & Cupich isn't enough proof there is a state of emergency in the Church, then nothing will ever be enough.
Phil Lawler was absolutely right.
ReplyDeleteThe SSPX is about to jump out of the barque of Peter.
The cherry picked examples of liturgical abuse are not typical of ordinary parishes.
Can't agree! Not only too many liturgical abuses in too many parishes and dioceses, but advancement of homosexual ideology everywhere. Not to mention the first step to canonize a clergy sex abuser. Is that now the "ordinary" life of the Church?
DeleteWell said Mary Ann. I went back to the TLM about 4 years ago and I agree with both Fr. Pagliarani and your sentiment on the NO. Due to scheduling this past Mother’s Day I went to a NO mass, while I’m sure this one was valid, it was hollow; no reverence, no holiness. I was so saddened for the Parishioner’s (the few that were there on a Saturday 5p Mass) because they don’t know what they are missing.
ReplyDeleteIn my area, younger pastors are increasingly more orthodox than many older senior pastors.
ReplyDeleteIt is the Church hierarchy that promotes and allows non-orthodox Catholic practices and beliefs.
The "Rot at the Top" continues to be the problem, especially when orthodox faithful priests are rarely selected to be ordained as new bishops.
The Vatican II Revolution in the Church will be eventually replaced by a new and orthodox Catholic Counter-Revolution, similar to the Counter-Reformation that bloomed so spectacularly in the Church in the late 16th and early 17th centuries.
Ano M.A.
Spot on Mary Ann!! I am a cradle N.O. Catholic who "converted" to traditional Catholicism about 12 years ago. I drive 25 miles one way to attend a FSSP parish, passing many, many N.O. parishes along the way. Have to get up very early to avoid traffic and spend more than an hour driving every single Sunday (that is more like 2.5 hrs on Holy Days). Other than 1 N.O. parish about 15 min from me that is the best of the worst, all others are simply unattendable. The standard N.O. parish has morphed into a different religion I fear. This is clearly the greatest crisis ever in the history of the church. I pray that the SSPX consecrations and what ensues from the Vatican will open many people's eyes!!
ReplyDeleteif this were ONLY about the Mass, there would be no "Rome vs. SSPX" stuff going on.
ReplyDeleteThe EF is not a problem to Rome; witness the FSSP and ICK Masses (there are others) all around the world and in the US. While they are not "advertised," EF Masses are also said in many parishes which are not served by those Orders.
SSPX's concern--and it is a legitimate one, and important--is the sloppy wording of VatII documents which appears to allow contradiction(s) of centuries of Catholic dogma. But somehow, this has been converted to an "Old Rite War." One hates to think that the SSPX is dragging a red herring across the road, but....
ALL serious Catholics would love to have it out on the dogmatics of the matter. That does not mean that they can no longer attend an EF Mass. But the SSPX's framing of the issue is unfortunate, indeed.
The Society has brought up many issues besides the liturgy: modernism, synodality, ecumenism, etc. Their Crisis in the Church series is extensive. I believe it's over 50 hour long episodes. I've watched most of them and they are definitely looking at the big picture. I'm also not sure you are correct about the EF not being a problem in Rome. Maybe excommunicating the Society is the first step before they withdraw the permission from the other EF communities. It's pretty clear that the long range goal is the elimination of Sacred Tradition and creation of new synodal, ecumenical Church. The movie Catholic (Conflict) pegs it.
DeleteLike many Catholics I also check bulletins, websites, and of course Mass times when I travel. Some of my relatives attend Mass regularly so I will go with them but sometimes I would rather drive elsewhere (other times it's fine). In my area I still drive regularly (and tithe and register) to the parish in my old neighborhood because I feel more at home there and I like the pastor and the parochial vicars there too. The parish closest to me if I attend on Sunday I will normally go to the early morning Mass (0730) which isn't as crowded and more respectful than the two later Masses. I do go there if a Sunday falls on an inclement weather day so I don't have to drive 35 minutes. I live in the South so drivers are paranoid on inclement weather days.
ReplyDelete