Search This Blog

Wednesday, July 2, 2025

The Impact on the Catholic Church from Division: Not Pretty!

At the Last Supper, Jesus prayed that all might be one. That reality seems further away than ever. It's easy to understand how the division between religions is disastrous for the world. Religious wars throughout the millennia illustrate that so clearly no one with eyes and ears can miss it. What's more difficult to understand on a spiritual level is the division among Catholics who claim the same religion, but are more and more divided.

I'm not talking about the division between cafeteria Catholics who pick and choose among doctrines and those who embrace the fullness of the faith. I'm talking about the division between our spiritual shepherds and laity who claim to embrace the faith, but persecute those who refuse to abandon the faith of our fathers practiced for centuries. 

I'm still reading Archbishop Lefebvre's Open Letter to Confused Catholics. The Chapter on "True and False Obedience" shows how little has changed since 1986 when the book was published. In fact, the division is worse than ever with faithful Catholics actually being thrown out of our churches. We are the unwelcome stepchildren of our abusive fathers. Sad! Do our shepherds not realize the damage they are causing to the faith?

Here's what the archbishop describes:

Division affects the smallest manifestations of piety. In Val-de-Marne, the diocese got the police to eject twenty-five Catholics who used to recite the Rosary in a church which had been deprived of a priest for a long period of years. In the diocese of Metz, the bishops brought in the Communist mayor to cancel the loan of a building to a group of traditionalists. In Canada six of the faithful were sentenced by a Court, which is permitted by the law of that country to deal with this kind of matter, for insisting on receiving Holy Communion on their knees. The Bishop of Antigonish had accused them of "deliberately disturbing the order and the dignity of religious service." The judge gave the "disturbers" a conditional discharge for six months! According to the Bishop, Christians are forbidden to bend the knee before God! Last year, the pilgrimage of young people to Chartres ended with a Mass in the Cathedral gardens because the Mass of St. Pius V was banned from the Cathedral itself. A fortnight later, the doors were thrown open for a spiritual concert in the course of which dances were performed by a former Carmelite nun.

Are not many of these abuses still taking place? How many parishes have told Catholics they can't pray the rosary together in Church after Mass? It happened in one of my own former parishes. People being instructed to stand for Communion and continue standing until everyone receives. We heard that at a beach parish numerous times, a parish, incidentally, where the tabernacle was in the back of the church. The people physically turned their backs on Christ every time they entered the "worship space." 

And more...Demanding that the faithful receive the Lord of the universe in the hand? Yup...common during COVID and still happening. Secular organizations, like zoning commissions, used to block traditional groups from opening churches where the people can worship in the same manner as St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Dominic, St. Therese of Lisieux St. Gianna Molla and all the saints up to Bugnini the Mason's Mass imposed after Vatican II. Friends, and even families, divided because those who embrace the Mass of the Ages attend SSPX chapels: the religious wars on a small scale.

Yup! The persecution continues, divisions only become wider. 

The archbishop goes on: 

Two religions confront each other; we are in a dramatic situation and it is impossible to avoid a choice, but the choice is not between obedience and disobedience. What is suggested to us, what we are expressly invited to do, what we are persecuted for not doing, is to choose an appearance of obedience. But even the Holy Father cannot ask us to abandon our faith. We therefore choose to keep it and we cannot be mistaken in clinging to what the Church has taught for two thousand years. The crisis is profound, cleverly organised and directed, and by this token one can truly believe that the master mind is not a man but Satan himself. For it is a master-stroke of Satan to get Catholics to disobey the whole of Tradition in the name of obedience.

And that's the crux of the matter. I think it was Bella Dodd who said that the Communists believed they would destroy the Church through the requirement of obedience. You see it: the bishops' bending their knees to orders from the hypocritical Rome of "synodality" down to the minutia about what can be printed in parish bulletins. And when a bishop stands up and refuses to divide his diocese by ending the TLM (Traditional Latin Mass), what happens? He's thrown out to the cheers of the liberals and the wreckovation of that diocese.

We are, indeed, in a crisis and it's time Catholics stopped letting themselves be spun around like whirling dervishes by the wolves in roman collars. They want a new church where the laws of God are extinguished and the "rights of man" are elevated to sacraments. We live in challenging times. Let us all pray with Jesus at the Last Supper that we all may be one, not in a false unity, but under the banner of Christ the King, in unity with the Holy Catholic Church of the apostles and martyrs.

Pray for the Church and read Archbishop Lefebvre's book. You don't have to buy it; click the link above for the PDF. It's a great prescription for eliminating confusion, a red pill in fact.

May Jesus Christ be praised!

12 comments:

  1. I read the book years ago. Perhaps a re-read is in order since I've embraced sedevacantism.

    Two things pop out at me. One, that you have a previous parish; Catholics should not have to Church hop, that's what Protestants do. Two, "But even the Holy Father cannot ask us to abandon our faith."
    Indeed. But they have. And that's impossible for Peter.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Catholic seminaries teach that Jesus didn't pray for unity but that the church made up that passage later.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Demanding that the faithful receive the Lord of the universe in the hand?"

    The same Lord who touched lepers would be apalled that your hand touches him. He's ok with touching the saliva in your mouth and your gastrointestinal fluids, but not your hand.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You missed the point. There are two groups that are fed. Infants and the sick and elderly who are totally dependent on others for their care and lovers who feed each other (the wedding cake symbol). Those two things illustrate our relationship to God. We are totally dependent on Him and He loves us like a lover. (Song of Songs) The other issue is disrespect for the Eucharist. The reason the altar boys hold a paten under the mouths and hands is to catch any crumbs since even the tiniest crumb holds Jesus: Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity. How many crumbs fall on the floor from those receiving in the hand? How many are stepped on? I've seen people after Communion wipe their hands together as if to wipe away and "crumbs." And then you have the question of those who will deliberately pretend to consume the host but take it to desecrate it. Priests talk about finding consecrated hosts in the pews or in the hymn books or on the floor.

      One last point. Those who receive on the tongue clearly believe in the Real Presence and show it by their body language. I'm not so sure about those receiving in the hand.

      Delete
    2. The doctrine that the whole Christ is contained in each crumb is false, as is any notion that that the consecration is irreversible as if someone leaving a wafer to mold its literally Jesus molding. Its an absurdity. Those tests when a wafer in the tabernacle grows red mold and a Catholic church sends it to be tested at a lab and it comes back the red is not blood but is mold, proves that wafers certainly do not remain consecrated irrevocably but revert back to normal bread when the liturgy is over.

      Delete
    3. Did you every read Doctor at Calvary? Dr. Barbet describes how Jesus' wounds would become infected, so his human body was susceptible to "corruption."

      Delete
    4. The Bible explicitly says he would not be subject to corruption. Acts 2:27-31. 27, nec dabis sanctum tuum videre corruptionem. 31, neque caro ejus vidit corruptionem.

      Delete
  4. If you call a man Holy Father you have not the faith which Christ delivered for he said "call no man on earth Father for you have one Father in heaven."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a worn out Protestant argument. If you're a person of good will you can read this:https://www.catholic.com/tract/call-no-man-father
      If you're a person of ill will who just likes to bash Catholics, you can condemn St. Paul who said this: "I write not these things to confound you; but I admonish you as my dearest children. For though you might have ten thousand guardians in Christ, you do not have many fathers. Indeed, in Christ Jesus I became your father through the gospel." 1 Cor 4-14-15 In other translations, Paul says "I have begotten you." Is that not what a father does/

      Delete
    2. It really isn't, because I can argue that calling the Pope Holy Father is much worse than calling Fr. Mike Father Mike. Because you are replacing the ONE God the Father with the Pope when you call him Holy Father in a way you aren't so much with Fr. Mike. Even like an Anglican who calls their priests fathers could make this argument about the Pope. Because you're not only calling the Pope "father" but "Holy Father" and its always capitalized and so creates confusing with the Father.

      Delete
    3. Interestingly, after I made that last reply that even in churches that call their priests father it could be understood that calling the pope Holy Father violates Jesus' command, I started watching a livestream of Jay Dyer talking about a debate he had recently with Vatican II Catholics defending that Muslims and Catholics worship the same God, and someone called in saying he is Orthodox and he thinks that although its ok to call priests father he thinks Jesus was talking about how Catholics call the Pope Father in a much higher sense like some infallible divine man. Now that is very interesting that not only a Protestant can see this, but even an Eastern Orthodox.

      Delete
    4. I don't know any Catholics who mistake the pope for God. Calling him Holy Father honors his important role as the visible authority God left on earth. Every priest acts in personal Christi as another Christ. That doesn't mean we mistake our parish priest for Jesus, but we recognize that he is an instrument of God's grace with the power to offer the holy sacrifice of the Mass and bind and loose sin in Confession. It's not that complicated and it's one of those things that Timothy warns against:
      "Of these things put them in mind, charging them before the Lord. Contend not in words, for it is to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers." 2 Timothy 2:14

      Delete