Search This Blog

Tuesday, March 25, 2025

"Charity Begins at Home." Just ask the Catholic CEOs with their exorbitant salaries!


The Catholic bishops are suing the government. Are we surprised? Isn't that what leftists always do when the gravy train is under threat. How many times has Planned Parenthood sued to keep their baby-killing machine at full speed ahead supported with billions from the taxpayers?

Sad to say, many of the bishops' "charity" organizations help the Left continue their contraception/abortion services both at home and abroad. They have also been instrumental in defeating pro-life legislators and replacing them with pro-abortion champions. Just ask pro-life stalwart California congressman Bob Dornan who was replaced by abortion extremist Loretta Sanchez with the help of CCHD (Catholic Campaign for Human Development). She won by fewer than a thousand votes with support from CCHD grantees who essentially laundered the Catholic "charity" bucks. 

From its conception, CCHD was rooted in the philosophy of atheist Saul Alinsky whose Industrial Areas Foundation benefitted from Catholics donating to what they were led to believe was a charity helping the poor. Alinsky and Msgr. Jack Egan were the architects who designed the Campaign for Human Development program (The word Catholic was added later.) that allowed "social justice" change agents to pick the pockets of Catholics in the pew. Anne Hendershot, in a 2011 article in Catholic World Report, Alinskyite from the Start, exposed the links between Alinsky and CCHD and offered this interesting bit:
Alinsky once wrote, “All great leaders invoke moral principles to cover naked self-interest in the clothing of freedom, equality, a law higher than man-made law…. All effective actions require the passport of morality.” Alinsky died in 1972, but his CCHDfunded IAF continues to invoke these same moral principles in today’s Catholic parishes.

Exactly! And that's what we're seeing today with deep Church hand-wringing and crocodile tears over the DOGE cuts. Every article coming from the bishops' mouthpieces adopts the pretense that everyone invading the country is fleeing persecution rather than looking for all the goodies offered by Uncle Sam with money stolen from taxpayers. You can be sure that the CC (Catholic Charities)  CEOs making $200,000 to $500,000 annually are among those screaming the loudest. Michael Hichborn of the the Lepanto Institute has done yeoman's work exposing them. In some cases most of the income of the "charities" goes to salaries and compensation. And that doesn't even include administration and fundraising expenses:  

  • Archdiocese of Baltimore -- 73%
  • Diocese of Rochester -- 74%
  • Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis -- 54%
  • Diocese of Trenton -- 71%
  • Archdiocese of Chicago -- 40%
  • Diocese of Syracuse -- 57%
See Lepanto's article, A Question of Charity, where they examine ten diocesan CC programs. The fact is, it really isn't about "charity" at all:
Simply put – love is characterized by the desire and pursuit of the good for someone else without any recourse to the self. Purchasing and handing out sandwiches to the hungry, giving away clothing to the naked, and providing shelter to the homeless without any sense of payment for these acts are all acts of love. Conversely, being paid to do these things is simply a job, and while there may be true compassion in the midst of the act, the material payment for the action merits little in Heaven. As our Lord said of those who perform righteous deeds so that others may see them, “they have received their reward.” And so, much the same is true of those who perform the works of charity for payment.

If those who perform works of charity for payment will have already received their rewards here on earth, and have not stored them up in Heaven, what of those who are actually getting rich in the name of service to the poor? Much has been said lately of the massive amounts of government money going to Catholic Charities, and some are beginning to awaken to the grotesque salaries taken by their CEOs. Here, we will examine ten Catholic Charities organizations, analyzing their reception of government grants, the salaries paid out, and the payments received by their CEOs.

I asked Michael if Lepanto has researched the Diocese of Arlington's CC program. He told me that Arlington doesn't file an IRS form 990. Religious non-profits are exempt. After Lepanto's exposé, maybe all the other CCs will take the exemption as well. 

I took a look at Arlington's audit for the period ending June 2023. I haven't studied it in detail, but found some interesting points. Federal and state grants for the period amounted to $6,602,510. CC spent $2,774,305 on management and general expenses. Another $971,939 was spent on fundraising. CC pays the diocese to rent offices in the chancery ($228,726 in FY 2023) and running ads in the Arlington Catholic Herald ($30,939 in FY 2023). Total reimbursements to the diocese in FY 2023 were $2,502,225.

To be fair, the chancery also donates directly to Catholic Charities, but isn't charity part of the diocese's mission? Shouldn't CC be a department of the diocese rather than a separate entity? It seems strange to me to use "charity" money to pay yourself.

We all have an obligation to serve the poor. But charity in the Church has become an industry, a well paid industry in fact. In another Lepanto report, Charity as Industry, Hichborn writes:

That the works of charity are now an industry is completely undeniable. Catholic charitable organizations compete with other organizations for large government grants, and in the name of helping the poor, executives in these organizations are raking in the cash. For instance, the tax form 990 for fiscal year 2014 for Catholic Charities USA shows the top eight paid employees all making over six figures each. In fact, for working a logged 35 hours per week, Fr. Larry Snyder made $381,080 and his Chief Operating Officer raked in $412,439. That’s two individuals working to help the poor, pulling in nearly half-a-million dollars EACH. All told, with benefits included, the top eight executives at Catholic Charities USA account for $2,027,680.
It’s no different at Catholic Relief Services. The latest tax form 990 shows that CRS’s president, Dr. Carolyn Woo, is earning $445,426 in salary and benefits in order to do “charitable” work. And the obscene salaries paid to the top eight of CRS’s executive leadership comes to $2,180,935. In fact, 27.5% of the Rice Bowl collection for 2014 (see page 18 of CRS’s 2014 Annual Report) paid the salaries and benefits of these eight individuals ALONE. That’s one of every three dollars collected from pew-sitting Catholics across the country going to pay the salaries and benefits of eight people … all in the name of helping the poor.

It's pretty obvious that many of our Catholic charities have warmly embraced the concept that "Charity begins at home." And their CEOs are busy filling their bank accounts with the "charity" money donated by the patsies in the pews and the largesse extorted from the taxpayers. As for saving souls? No need to bother with that. 

But in fact, the first act of charity is to save souls.  And yet, many of the so-called Catholic charities have abandoned that mission and brag about it. "No-no-no! Proselytism!" they say. And we all know the way Francis defines that word as any attempt to evangelize others and draw them to the faith. We don't need to do that anyway, because every religion is a path to God. The Catholic faith is nothing special. Ho-hum!

Sad times we live in, eh? If you want to donate wisely, check out Lepanto's charity reports to find out where you can safely give. And you might include a check for Lepanto. They are providing a great service to Catholics! 

Lepanto Institute
PO Box 269
Partlow, VA 22534

6 comments:

  1. I am so outraged, I have gone out and bought some Tesla stock because Hannity told me it was Kristalnacht for poor Elon who is only the top paid CEO in the world making $23.5 BILLION a year in salary.
    https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/top-10-highest-paid-ceos-in-the-world-from-elon-musk-to-sundar-pichai-and-their-annual-salary/articleshow/117179708.cms
    https://www.ainvest.com/news/tesla-stock-soars-musk-hannity-interview-avoid-9-week-losing-streak-2503
    Grifting off 'carbon credits' and $100 million lies.
    https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2025/03/26/cyberlies/
    In 2011 Crisis Magazine said Obama was "pitting us against each other:" "Obama and the Democratic Party have led increasingly successful efforts to pit Americans against one another through the politics of hate and envy. Attacking CEO salaries, the president — last year during his Midwest tour — said, “I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money.” ...When you recognize that celebrities earn salaries that are some multiples of CEO salaries, you have to ask: Why is it that rich CEOs are demonized and not celebrities? A clue might be found if you asked: Who’s doing the demonizing? It turns out that the demonizing is led by politicians and leftists with the help of the news media, and like sheep, the public often goes along. Why demonize CEOs?... If all CEOs worked for nothing, it would mean absolutely little or nothing to the average American’s bottom line." https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/pitting-us-against-each-other
    But now it's opus dei eric sammons pitting us against each other:
    https://x.com/EricRSammons/status/1887955911576092762
    What's Sammons' salary as 'editor-in-chief' of crisis magazine? Why don't Hichborn bite the hand of Judie Brown who spun him off to Lepanto so his 'scandal' reporting wouldn't hurt her family's Catholic printing contracts? "ALL lacks sufficient board independence to help ensure that the board’s decisions are being made in the best interest of the charity versus its officers and directors. This is of particular concern given ALL’s history of transactions with the company of one of its board members. For example, in its 2015 and 2017 tax filings, American Life League reported paying $1,862,208 and $554,897, respectively, to Anthony Kane and Associates for “printing and mailing services,” with the relationship reported as “board of director is owner” (IRS Form 990, Schedule L, Part IV, Business Transactions Involving Interested Persons). In 2015, this payment accounted for more than 38% of ALL’s total spending for the year. In ALL’s 2016 and 2018 tax filings, ALL reported a similar transaction between American Life League and the company owned by its board member, but it omitted the dollar amounts involved."
    https://blog.charitywatch.org/charitywatch-alerts-regulators-of-red-flags-at-american-life-league/
    https://www.catholicsforchoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/2006_opposition_notes_american_life_league.pdf
    Here's what the Opus Dei Knights of Columbus CEOs are making: "According to the Knights’ 990 IRS returns, as Supreme Knight in 2014, Anderson took in $2.3 million. In 2021, he received over $1.9 million in reportable compensation, while Patrick E. Kelly, who took over as Supreme Knight on March 1st of that year, took in only $1,159,239.00."
    https://akacatholic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Opus-Dei-and-the-Knights-Booklet.pdf

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Did you think everyone in the whole world would be mentioned?

      Delete
  2. The black guy gets paid the least. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  3. Give to your neighbor or family member. You know them & you know what they need.

    When there was a family in need at our parish an email was sent out soliciting for money donations and meals. That's charity.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I was concerned when you appeared to slide from CCHD to Catholic Charities. "C"CHD is not a Catholic organization and just needs to go away.

    Catholic Charities are incorporated diocesan organizations (or "departments"), therefore "owned" by each bishop and theoretically reformable by him. It seems logical to me to move parishioner charitable donations through each diocese's Catholic Charities. Catholic Charities USA is not the emperor of all the diocesan Catholic Charities, but a "voluntary" association of the same. The USCCB should probably consider DOCE-ing it or even shutting it down as it is purely administrative.

    I am not at all against the Lepanto Institute, but it seems that they perform "desk reviews" of publicly available documents; I have found that some dots are not connected in some of these reviews. Nevertheless, they show up some of our decidedly uncurious administrators.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that CCHD "just needs to go away," but I'm puzzled at you saying it isn't a "Catholic organization" since it was founded by the bishops, is run by the USCCB out of their offices in D.C., and has an annual formal collection in parishes. Can you explain what you mean?

      Delete