Jorge Bergoglio, S.J. and the Destruction of the Roman Catholic Church

Identical Ideological Twins,
i.e., identical in mind and actions
Jorge Bergoglio, SJ, left
Pedro Arrupe SJ, right

On October 11, 2019, I posted this on Les Femmes. I'll use part of that post in this one but with a more bitter twist since, in the two years since then, things have gotten even worse than expected with Jorge Bergoglio's scorched earth policies.

The plan of the Modernist Vatican II Church to destroy the Ancient Rite of the Mass, and therefore Traditional Catholic belief,  has been known for decades, but now we have Bergoglio's Traditionis Custodes to put a stranglehold on all things actually Catholic, not because Francis is trying to guide the Church but because he's trying to utterly destroy her. To the ground. Into dust. 

This fact can be discovered on pages 119-120 in Romano Amerio's brilliant Iota Unum. Below is a snippet from Chapter V, 55, The Post-Conciliar Period:

...but if the Church should die to itself and break with its past so as to rise as a new creature, the past is not something that should be appropriated and lived out, but something from which one should detach oneself and then repudiate; and reverence and respect for it will thus vanish. The words respect and reverence include the idea of looking backward, for which there is no room in a Church projected towards the future, a Church which sees the destruction of its past as a condition of its own rebirth.

The Church of Schism's Two Faces

What's it going to be? Make up your minds, Catholics. Pacha Mama or Mama Mary, Mother Earth or Our Holy Mother the Church, tribal shamans or Catholic priests, women priests or celibate male priests, feathers or no feathers, primitive man or civilized man, praying to demonic idols or praying to the ONE TRUE GOD? It's one or the other. It cannot be both. Otherwise it's idolatry, heresy and schism. Basically defined as Pedro Arrupe type Jesuitism. Are we now all Jimmy Martin Jesuits? 

Pedro Arrupe, S.J., was removed just as Jorge Bergoglio, S.J., must be removed

The Twins - Two Peas in a Pod
Jorge Bergoglio, S.J., left;
Pedro Arrupe, S.J., right

Remember when Pedro Arrupe was removed as Superior General of the Jesuit Order by Pope John Paul II? No? No memory of that? 

It's no use consulting the Internet for validation. It has no memory of that event. However both Wikipedia and a few articles from the leftist Jesuit magazine, America, say that Arrupe "resigned". The Jesuits won't admit that John Paul II removed Arrupe. They say that Arrupe resigned due to his failing health. They say that Arrupe was going to recommend American Jesuit Vincent O'Keefe, S.J., as his replacement when instead John Paul II "intervened" and appointed two other Jesuits, Paola Dezza and Giuseppe Pittau, to oversee the Society of Jesus until a new Superior General could be elected.

In fact, the cold hard truth is that on October 5, 1981, Pope John Paul II rightfully removed Pedro Arrupe, S.J.,  forever from the Generalate, which in turn, moved O'Keefe from his post as Vicar General of the Society and from all hope of being elected General by a subsequent Congregation. Then he (JPII) firmly and resolutely appointed Dezza and Pittau as overseers until such time (two years later, September of 1983) a new Superior General could be elected. 

The See of Peter Is in the Captivity of a Marxist Heterodox Jesuit

If you want to know what Francis is doing to the Church, and why, read Malachi Martin's book and the conundrum will become crystal clear. Archbishop Vigano said that he was studying the history of the Jesuits "with great care" and this book surely must be one of his sources.

First read this article: The Papacy in Jesuitical Captivity; Archbishop Vigano and the "60-Year-Old Plan" Then read this article: Praise for The Political Pope: A Book Worth Supporting

Then read Malachi Martin's book → → → → → → → → → → → → 👉
Order it HERE. Then read George Neumayr's book The Political Pope found at bookstores everywhere or order it HERE.

"Were St. Ignatius of Loyola, the founder of the Jesuit order, alive today, we know one thing for certain: this modernist Jesuit pope wouldn’t ordain him." - George Neumayr

And I know one thing for certain. If Pedro Arrupe and Pope Francis had presented themselves to St Ignatius of Loyola as potential Jesuits, St Ignatius would never have ordained them. 

The Primitive Charism of the Amazon - Arrupe's Dream Realized Through Francis

 The testosterone lacking 
in the Church, found in
the Amazon

Here's a joke I made up...

Jesuit Father General Pedro Arrupe (RIP) - "We (the Jesuits) are looking for a primitive charism."

Jesuit Pope Francis - "Found it!"

In the Amazon, Pope Francis found the primitive charism Arrupe, that old agent of change, was looking for in the Society of Jesus, except now that primitive charism is for the entire Catholic Church which Francis is changing into Arrupe's Marxist secular humanist dream.

The following is taken verbatim from Malachi Martin's 1987 book The Jesuits: The Society of Jesus and the Betrayal of the Roman Catholic Church. While reading, please remember that Pope Francis is a Jesuit.

"The mortal remains of hope and change (Obama?) were buried in a continuing landslide of dedication to Liberation Theology and its redefinition of the Church and its teachings; of Jesuit magazines plugging away without pause at the erosion of papal and Church authority over morality and doctrine; and of ever bolder attacks, in Jesuit writings and sermons, on the person and the papacy of John Paul II and the basic dogmas of the Church he leads." p 484