Bergoglio Is the New Muhammad

IMPOSTURE
Definition: act or an instance of deceiving others, especially by assuming a false identity 
Similar: pretense, deceit, deception, hoax, trick, ruse, fraud, trickery, artifice, false

Jorge Bergoglio, posturing as the Vicar of Christ, is fast inventing a new religion from the remains of the Catholic Church that he's currently deliberately destroying. Using the Seven Marks of Imposture we see that Bergoglio fits the description of an impostor, picking up pieces of Catholicism here and there and changing them into something else entirely, exactly as his predecessor Muhammad did 1400 years ago. Muhammad was not stopped then, and so far no one has stopped Bergoglio now.

The Life of Mahomet by Humphrey Prideaux, written 327 years ago, therefore minus any hint of political correctness whitewashing the truth, was followed by Prideaux's 200 page Letter to the Deists outlining Muhammad's fraudulent imposture as the Prophet of Islam. Muhammad's false identity as a prophet was a lie, his new religion of Islam a deception, and his imposture as God's last prophet a complete counterfeit, yet today almost 2 billion people on earth believe in Islam with Muhammad as their prophet. The goal of Muhammad the Impostor was to subjugate and destroy through the act of pretending to be someone else in order to deceive others.

Looking at Jorge Bergoglio through Prideaux's Seven Marks of Imposture wherein he proves that Muhammad was an impostor, we see that Bergoglio likewise fits the description of being a deceitful fake, tricking Catholics into a new religion parallel with Muhammad's trickery with his invention of Islam. Bergoglio the Impostor's goal is to subjugate Catholics and destroy the Catholic Faith through the act of pretending to be the Vicar of Christ in order to deceive the world.

There are Catholics who inerrantly believe Bergoglio's imposture, believe in the reality of his fictive personna. They believe Bergoglio's fraudulent actions imposed upon themselves, they believe his fake identity as the Vicar of Christ destroying Christ's Church, inventing new doctrine and stepping on the Latin Mass while twisting his heel as if the Old Mass were a poisonous insect to be crushed into the dirt.

Each of the Seven Marks of Imposture is several pages long. The list below merely gives a hint of each Mark, whereas Prideaux goes into each in extensive detail.

1. The first Mark of an Imposture: "That it must have for its end some carnal interest is a thing so plain and evident that it will not need much proof. For to impose a cheat upon mankind, and in the matter of such great importance...cannot be conceived as to why anyone should put himself upon such a design that doth not propose some very valuable advantage to himself in the success....To enterprise a cheat upon all mankind and in a thing of such importance as introducing a new religion and the abolishing of the Old one must be an undertaking of the greatest difficulty and hazard imaginable. And when a man puts upon himself all this, the Nature of the Thing manifestly leads us to conclude that he must propose something to himself which may make him amends for all the result.

For when so much is put to hazard, men do not do it for nothing. There must always be some great benefit in the bottom of such a design, something that the undertaker values at a more than ordinary rate to make him engage in so exceeding a difficulty and dangerous an enterprise. For whenever a venture is great, it must be taken for granted there is an end proposed which in the estimation of the venturer is equivalent thereto.

What it was that put Mahomet on his imposture, the foregoing history of his life sufficiently shows; it was his ambition and his lust. To have sovereignty over his country, to gratify his ambition, and as many women as he pleased to satisfy his lust was what he aimed at...." 

2. The second Mark of an Imposture: "That it can have none but wicked men for the authors of it. For thus to impose upon mankind a false religion is the worst of cheats and the highest injustice which can be done either to God or man; to God because it robs Him of the worship of His creatures, either by diverting it to a false object, or by directing it to Him in such a false way that it cannot be accepted of before Him. And to man because it deprives him of his God by putting him upon such a false religion as must necessarily alienate both God's Mercy and God's Favor to him. And to do this is such a consummate piece of iniquity that it is impossible anyone can arrive thereto without having first corrupted himself to a great degree in all things else. For such a one must have cast off all fear of God, as well as all regard of Man before he could ever offer so great a wickedness against both..."

3. The third Mark of an Imposture: "Both these two last Marks must appear in the very contexture of the imposture itself. If they had been such wicked persons as thus to have imposed upon us a false religion for their own interest, both their wickedness and the interest which they drove at must necessarily appear in the very contexture of the religion itself...for when a Man proposes an end of self interest and invents a new religion, and writes a new law on purpose for the obtaining of it, it's impossible but that this end must appear in the means....For this purpose the new religion and the new law must be calculated for this end and be all formed and contrived for such an end..."

4. The fourth Mark of an Imposture: "That it can never be so framed but that it must contain some palpable falsities, which will discover the falsity of all the rest. For whoever invents a lie can never do it so cunningly and knowingly but still there will be some flaw or other left in it which will expose it to a discovery; and no man who frames an invention can ever secure it herefrom without two qualifications, which no man can have, and they are 1) a thorough knowledge of all manner of Truths and 2) such an exact memory as can bring them all present to his mind. 

For to make a lie pass without contradiction he must put it on a seeming agreement with all other Truths whatever...If there be but any one known Truth in the whole Scheme of Nature with which it interferes, this must make the discovery, and there is no man that foregoeth an imposture but makes himself liable this way to be convicted of it...."   

5. The fifth Mark of an Imposture: "That where ever it is first propagated, it must be done by craft and fraud, and this is natural to all manner of cheats. For the end of such being to deceive, craft and fraud are the means whereby it is to be effected. In this case, a lie must be made to go for a truth, and an appearance for a reality, and to compass this, a great deal of art must be made use of to be what it pretends, and also to craft such a mist before the eyes of men, that they may not see it to be otherwise and that especially where the cheat is an imposture of religion..."

6. The sixth Mark of an Imposture: "No imposture, when entrusted with many conspirators, can be long concealed. For what plot or conspiracy have we ever known or heard of which has been thus managed and had not for some false brother or other to discover it, especially if there be any great wickedness intended by it, or any great danger attending the execution of it as mostly in such designs....And what plot can be more wicked than to impose a false religion upon mankind? And what can be more dangerous than to attempt it?...And especially in a case to discover a plot against the souls of all mankind and deliver the world from being imposed upon thereby..."

7. The seventh Mark of an Imposture is: "That it can never be established unless backed with force and violence. For if it has wicked men as its authors, worldly interest for its end, falsity and error for its doctrines, and received its rise from the craft and fraud of its prompters, the search of the inquisitive will soon find it out and mankind will not long bear the imposture unless they be overruled by violence and have all objections against it silenced with the sword at their throats. 

This was the method which Mahomet took to establish the false religion which he invented. For he prosecuted with war all that would not submit and made it no less than death for any to gainsay it, or so much as raise the least dispute against any of the doctrines of it....For the impostor declares all those to be heretics and prosecutes them with sword, fire and faggot that refuse to receive them...For it is only force and violence that can cram such things down men's throats, which their reason and their judgement must ever renounce..."

Conclusion: "The mistakes and errors about the worship of God, and the service we owe unto Him, which men are apt to run into when left to the conduct of their own light only, are monstrous and endless, and therefore demonstrate the necessity of Divine Revelation. For if God doth expect from us an account of our actions, it is necessary He should give us a law for the rule of them..."

Humphrey Prideaux's conclusion is that Islam was not from God and that Muhammad the Imposter was an instrument of the devil for inventing a new religion.

Similarly Bergoglio, like the rooster in the above picture walking on stilts pretending to be a flamingo, is an impostor, the Great Pretender, and The New Muhammad inventing a new religion from what was once God's Holy Catholic Faith.