Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Kennedy funeral. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kennedy funeral. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Bishop Gracida on the Kennedy Funeral

While Cardinal Sean O'Malley and Fr. Thomas Rosica ripped into Catholics who dared to criticize the Kennedy funeral which not only scandalized by honoring, no - nearly canonizing, the roaring lion of death but also included numerous liturgical abuses, one good bishop supports faithful laity. Bishop Rene Gracida, bishop emeritus of Corpus Christi, TX posted several thoughtful statements on his blog as well as a number of great articles from others. His words encourage the laity to continue fighting to uphold Catholic truth.

Thank you, Bishop Gracida, for being a beacon of light in the dark which is particularly black in many dioceses around the country where the shepherds are hiding their lights under a bushel basket in a closet in the basement. Thank you for being a true teacher who exhorts us to be soldiers of Christ in the Church Militant not burger flippers at the Church picnic.

THE SCANDAL OF THE EDWARD MOORE KENNEDY FUNERAL IN BOSTON

WHAT A DIFFERENCE IT WOULD MAKE IF TED KENNEDY HAD RECANTED HIS DISSENT FROM CHURCH TEACHINGS

THE SCANDAL OF THE TED KENNEDY FUNERAL, REVISITED – HOPEFULLY FOR THE LAST TIME

Saturday, September 5, 2009

From Donna Bethell to Cardinal O'Malley: "The Catholic Church failed Sen. Kennedy"

Printed below is a letter from another one of those Catholics whom Cardinal O'Malley has labelled angry, vindictive, and divisive. It seems today if Catholic laity step in to defend the faith when the hierarchy won't, we must be prepared to be attacked and vilified. Fr. John Hardon once told me, when I approached him during a home school convention for advice about Les Femmes, that when those with the authority to defend the faith won't, those who don't have the authority must. Such is the situation of laity today. We see our children and grandchildren robbed of the faith by the love affair between the hierarchy and the power brokers. Many bishops have traded their silence for a seat at the table with the elite.

Thank you, Donna, for telling the cardinal the truth. It isn't faithful laity who are divisive, and if we are angry, it is the righteous anger of mothers defending their children.

Cardinal O'Malley, you have our prayers. Please be a true shepherd who defends the sheep. There are too many hirelings who are willing to abandon the little lambs to the wolves. Ted Kennedy was indeed a lion, the one described by St. Peter (1 Peter 5:8) "prowling like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour"). He was also a wolf in Catholic clothing attacking the sheep, and many have followed his example to embrace sins that cry to heaven for vengeance. How many souls will be lost because of the public scandal enabled by princes of the Church? Please, Your Eminence, stop providing the Judases cover.


Dear Cardinal O'Malley,

I can hardly think of a more disingenuous description of Senator Edward Kennedy's position than "he did not publically [sic] support Catholic teaching and advocacy on behalf of the unborn." Sen. Kennedy was an active opponent of Catholic teaching on the unborn and other matters, such as same-sex "marriage." He worked tirelessly to preserve legal abortion, earning 100% ratings from NARAL and Planned Parenthood. He voted repeatedly and unfailingly for public funding of abortion and against any restrictions, including a ban on barbarous partial birth abortion. He worked against the Church in supporting legalization of same-sex "marriage," particularly in Massachusetts, and voted to fund embryonic stem cell research. Yet he had no trouble finding Catholic priests, like Frs. Drinan and Monan, to give him aid and cover, while he never had a bishop who was willing to instruct him in the true teaching of the Church and, for the good of his soul, call him to public account for his public sins.

Indeed, the Catholic Church failed Sen. Kennedy during his life and you, Cardinal O'Malley, failed him, his family, and the Church in his death. Do you really believe that the only way you could minister to the Kennedy family was to allow and even preside over that spectacle of a political canonization? You put the credit of the Catholic Church at the service of lies and the legacy of a public apostate who spent nearly 40 years of his political life in open, active hostility to Catholic doctrine on an essential matter, not an issue of prudential judgment. No amount of "aid to the poor" can balance that fact.

Please do not tell me that we must not judge. I am not judging Sen. Kennedy or you on the basis of internal conscience. I am stating objective facts.

God help you, Cardinal O'Malley, God have mercy on Senator Kennedy, and God help the Catholic Church in America.

Donna Bethell

Friday, September 4, 2009

Two good posts from Catholic Culture on the Kennedy Funeral Scandal

The Kennedy Funeral: Boston's Latest Scandal

Scandal Spelled Out

An Open Letter to Cardinal Sean O'Malley

Cardinal O'Malley posted a blog entry September 2nd "explaining" his involvement in the Kennedy funeral. It begs the question. People were not so much concerned about his presence, but about a public showcase funeral being allowed for a man who "obstinately persist[ed] in manifest grave sin" (Canon 915) who never publicly repented. With help from a prince of the Church, Ted Kennedy was allowed to scandalize to the end.

Sadly, Cardinal O'Malley shifted the argument to an ad hominem attack on those who criticized the event.
At times, even in the Church, zeal can lead people to issue harsh judgments and impute the worst motives to one another. These attitudes and practices do irreparable damage to the communion of the Church. If any cause is motivated by judgment, anger or vindictiveness, it will be doomed to marginalization and failure. Jesus’ words to us were that we must love one another as He loves us. Jesus loves us while we are still in sin. He loves each of us first, and He loves us to the end. Our ability to change people’s hearts and help them to grasp the dignity of each and every life, from the first moment of conception to the last moment of natural death, is directly related to our ability to increase love and unity in the Church, for our proclamation of the Truth is hindered when we are divided and fighting with each other.


And so, once again, a highly-placed cleric blames, not those who murder the innocent, work for the destruction of marriage, and endorse sodomy but those who demur when the hierarchy act as enablers. We are the ones presumed to be motivated by "anger and vindictiveness." We are the ones doing "irreparable damage" to whom the cardinal "impute[s] the worst motives." Sadly, the cardinal's language is the same used by "pro-choicers" who cannot address the argument so they engage in ad hominem attacks.

I am grieved by Cardinal O'Malley's harsh judgment on the real defenders of life. I pray for Sen. Kennedy who was allowed to go to his grave without uttering one word of public repentance for being a champion of the culture of death. In the end the clergy surrounding him apparently acted, not like John the Baptist calling for reform of life, but like the pharisees tickling his ears. I hope he sincerely repented of his mortal sins of publicly advancing the murder of the innocent, sodomy, and the destruction of marriage. Above all I hope he repented for his frequent sacrilegious reception of Communion. There is little evidence that he did, but only God knows the state of his soul in his final moments.

I left a slightly different version of the comment below on the Cardinal's blog. Whether the moderator allows it is still in question. I publish it here as an open letter to the cardinal:

Your Eminence,

You set up a strawman on your blog post about the Kennedy funeral. Pro-lifers did not oppose a Catholic funeral for Sen. Kennedy. We hope that he repented. But public sins require public repentance and, sadly, that did not happen. The funeral should have been a private, family affair not what amounted to a public canonization leading others to believe that his actions were not gravely sinful and a serious scandal. It's ironic that Eunice Kennedy Shriver, a fine example of a pro-life Catholic, chose a humble private funeral. Her humility puts in greater contrast the unseemly spectacle at the cathedral honoring a champion of child-killing.

I find your condemnation and, dare I say, "judgment" of those who objected to the extravaganza puzzling. Is our intellect not called the "seat of judgment?" Did John the Baptist not "judge" the actions of those who paid lip service to faith while their actions showed them to be "whitewashed sepulchres filled with dead mens bones?"

Kennedy died as he lived, looking for human respect and accolades. He got them with your enabling assistance. Implied approval of homosexuality and the health care plan were incuded in the prayers of the faithful. Add that to the scandal and politicization of what was supposed to be a liturgical event but was actually thinly-disguised political theater.

Your excuses simply don't fly, Your Eminence. The faithful are looking for shepherds who love and defend the faith. The glittering public funeral for the lion of the culture of death was one more scandal damaging belief in the doctrines the Church teaches. Abortion is no big deal after all. Kennedy championed it to the end and not one word of caution was said at the funeral. The babies once again were sacrificed on the altar of human respect with your apparent approval.

The funeral was a scandal, Your Eminence, and your lovely words cannot make it less so.