The attack on the holdout juror has been going on for over a week since the hung jury in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy. The angry women jurors have been attacking him relentlessly and presenting a picture of an unstable, brooding man who couldn't defend his refusal to go along with the majority group and "inappropriately" demonstrated the murder of the children with a band fastened around a water bottle. [How is that inappropriate? Or were they just uncomfortable and angry because someone defended the children?]
Well, the silence is finally being broken and it appears that the defense attorney and the angry women on the jury are finally getting a little negative exposure of their own, not to mention the deplorable NBC10 Boston outlet that made identifying and doxing the juror possible. Jason Whitlock pointed out that black Republicans are targeted by liberals and that the juror's Catholic faith may also have elicited prejudice.
What's been going on in the media since the trial ended is disgraceful. The network provided the information needed for anyone to identify the juror and, not only him, but his brother and his family and his mother who are being harassed. Do we need any more reasons to disbelieve the mainstream media liars? Did the so-called journalists attempt to dig up dirt on any of the other jurors?
Note some interesting points in all these videos. 1) The holdout juror is a black Republican. 2) He says he did not lie on the questionnaire about his previous arrest and was questioned about it during jury selection and still seated. 3) His wife was an illegal alien who says she didn't want to prosecute because she was afraid of losing her child. Did she accuse him of abuse falsely? Worth asking. 4) He's Catholic; did that contribute to the other jurors' antagonism? 5) He felt the eight jurors who wanted to acquit on day one had an agenda. Really? Would that be surprising?
If you're interested or if you've swallowed the swill being churned out by the mainstream media you need to watch these videos. You certainly won't find the truth in the mainstream media.
I’m wondering who is or was doing Lindsay Clancy’s hair and make-up.
ReplyDeleteWho is helping her to look “camera ready”? She wears jewelry, earrings, a necklace..It’s very bizarre.
Hair, makeup, donning jewelry all take time and intention. Think about how long it takes just to get ready to go to mass, to go out to dinner or a party. It takes time and deliberate intention.
I remember seeing Andrea Yates on the news years ago, she looked like a very disturbed mother.
Lindsay Clancy looks like a lady intentionally trying to look as attractive as possible. Why?
The murderess is Catholic so how could him being Catholic be a problem to the other yentas?
ReplyDeleteDid you watch the Jason Whitlock video? He talks about his respect for Catholics and their firmness in the face of confrontation. Was it a factor? We'd have to ask the juror what he thought about it and if the other jurors knew he was Catholic. Clancy sure didn't act like a Catholic! She was like the false mother in the Solomon story.
Delete