Search This Blog

Loading...

Monday, May 18, 2015

Are Vatican Sharks Purging Orthodox Bishops?


Bishop Finn's "crime" was that he delayed reporting a priest with child porn on his computer. There was never an accusation of his covering up sex abuse. Danneels, on the other hand, did cover up sex abuse (including his own nephew!) for years. But he is still A-okay while Finn was purged. Is this the Vatican administration of the long knives? In with the progressives out with the orthodox?

Here's Finn's real crime:

At the National Catholic Reporter, the Kansas City-based flagship of the radical progressivists in the U.S. Church, Michael Sean Winters has all but admitted that Finn’s departure was the result of a campaign by a cohort of progressives. NCR clashed with Finn for years, and the bishop insisted the paper should cease identifying itself as Catholic....
Winters continues, “Kansas City had a long tradition of lay involvement in the workings of the diocese, dating back before the Second Vatican Council and its emphasis on the priesthood of the baptized. That tradition was ignored. Lines were drawn between the culture of the Church and the ambient culture.” The culture, in other words, that trumpets radical feminism, homosexuality, abortion, contraception and longs for a Catholic Church emasculated and guided by the secularist agenda. 
Clearly, Finn’s “flaw of hubris” was mainly that he was interested in restoring traditional concepts, like the priesthood of the ordained and a moral order in accordance with the Natural Law, to Kansas City that until 2005 had long been firmly and comfortably in the hands of post-Vatican II, 60s’ radicals. Finn’s rejection of the “ambient culture,” particularly of the acceptance of abortion, contraception and homosexuality, was the real sticking point for the NCR crowd.
Keep an eye on who's in and who's out at the Vatican. It would be nice to think politics doesn't play a part in faith, but Church history tells a widely different story and many saints died over Church/state politics: Joan of Arc, Thomas More, John Fisher, and Thomas a Becket to name a few.

When a member of the left, like John Allen, suggests a purge is going on, my thumbs start to prick:
The suspicion that Finn is the victim of an “ideological purge” was put forward recently not by conservatives but by John Allen, the former star of NCR, now associate editor of Crux, the Catholic news magazine of the Boston Globe. Shortly after the close of the 2014 Synod, Allen wrote of the possibility that Finn was one member of an “enemies list” held by Pope Francis, of those prominent prelates who would oppose a swing to the left in the Church....
“Many on the Catholic right can’t help but suspect that the recent preponderance of conservatives who’ve found themselves under the gun isn’t an accident,” Allen continued. “Some perceive a through-the-looking-glass situation, in which upholding Catholic tradition is now perceived as a greater offense than rejecting it.” 
Pope Francis needs to issue a clear statement of his intentions to clarify the speculation, Allen said. “Otherwise, the risk is that a good chunk of the Church may conclude that if the pope sees them as the enemy, there’s no good reason they shouldn’t see him the same way.”
What a thought! Please pray for the pope and for Holy Mother Church, the poor battered bride of Christ. And no matter what, don't jump out of the boat. The sharks circling in the water don't offer a viable alternative; just a painful, bloody end.

6 comments:

Elizabeth said...

Short answer: Yes and Yes. But there's one shark in charge of it all. And we know who that is.

Anonymous said...

Speaking as a local.......Finn was NOT at all liked in the diocese.......along with covering up a pedophile, he dug his own grave.........

Steven Cass said...

I agree that there was a concerted effort to get Bishop Finn out of the diocese. I disagree that he was treated unfairly. I do agree that Cardinal Danneels and all the rest who covered up child abuse should be retired and face civil penalties, as well as ordered to perform works of penance.

Here's the deal, as I see it... Finn offered up a juicy fastball for the modernists to hit out of the park. We can't be angry they hit a grand slam. It's clear, from all the reading I did, that though Bishop Finn did not cover up any abuse, he did put Ratigan in a position to continue making pornographic images of children, after Finn was aware of the images in Ratigan's computer.
Bishop Finn screwed up. Big time. B.I.G. time.

Bishops are allowed to make mistakes, and to learn and to grow as men, as Catholics, and as bishops. But for a bishop, in these times, to so idiotically do what Finn did, he needed to replaced. Kevin O'Brien handles this just wonderfully, I think:

http://www.thwordinc.blogspot.com/2015/04/my-first-post-on-finn.html

God bless, and pray for the Church, our Holy Father, and all bishops, priests, and religious.

Steven

Anonymous said...

My name is not Anonymous. I just don't do Gmail or the others.

My name is not Anonymous. But I have lived in the Diocese of Kansas City - St. Joseph for over 50 years and I can tell you for a fact that many, many, many priests, consecrated religious, seminarians, Church employees and ordinary laity like myself in this area loved Bishop Finn and are fully aware that the Ratigan case is 1% of why he was disappeared. The other 99% being that he was a man of exceptional ability and charity who stood in the way and wasn't going to budge.

My name is not Anonymous. Anonymous is the name of those who spoke so badly of Bishop Finn in Abp. Prendergast's scandalous report. Scandalous because Anonymous will say anything, and the Church was either too foolish or too corrupt in this case to factor that out. Scandalous because Bishop Finn didn't get to know the accusers who decided his fate. Unlike Our Lord, who was publicly accused. Was He not?

My name is not Anonymous. My name is John Heuertz. Call me up or write me if you would care to discuss this post. Though I should tell you first that if your name is Anonymous I won't respond to you.

Mary Ann Kreitzer said...

Thanks for your comment, John. My big disappointment is that Bishop Finn did not fight. I am seriously concerned about what will happen in my own diocese since my bishop is set to retire within the next year. Bishop Loverde gets credit for being more orthodox than he really is. He has been the assassin of a number of good priests. Nevertheless, in the current state of the Church I'm afraid we will get someone much worse. God help us. And let's all pray hard for Pope Francis.

Edison Frisbee said...

I share your concern for Arlington....I am very happy in my parish right now!