Hopefully, in the coming months not years, a case will be
brought to the Supreme Court that challenges the validity of the decision made
in 1972 with the case Roe v. Wade. We
don’t know what form that challenge may be since it isn’t clear what the
problem is in the first place. We are
clear that the now “historic decision” was then, and still is a problem, but
how it will be fixed and or eliminated is anyone’s guess.
The same kind of activists who developed this insane idea
of endorsing abortion are as active today, if not more so, since they have been
raised and have raised their own daughters, who managed to survive this evil
law, to believe this is a right and a so called right they are now wedded to more fiercely than their own husbands,
if they happen to have one.
I am not an expert on this subject, which is a sad
confession to have to make, when one calls their self Catholic. This is an American tragedy about which we
should all be well informed. Most of us
who never went to law school feel legal jargon is beyond our ability to
interpret and we lazily leave it to “the experts.” Oh, we occasionally listen to a talking head
on cable TV, who gives his or her impression of what a ruling means for the
majority of us, but we seldom if ever dive into the nuts and bolts.
There is a website you can access to hear oral arguments
for Supreme Court cases. It is: www.oyez.org. To access a particular case, such as Roe v. Wade,
you simply use the search bar on the left of the page.
I am currently reading the book Abuse of Discretion, by Clarke D. Forsythe, a history of this case
and the wretched evil scandal it is for all Americans and the world at
large.
If it is true that the devil’s
best defense is to convince you he does not exist, the devil in this decision
will want you to know as little about this unconstitutional ruling as we
already do. Informing yourself of the
background and the circumstances on the court will dispel any progress the
liberal left has made in convincing you this is “settled law” that cannot be
disturbed or even modified.
What I didn’t consider before starting this book was how
much public pressure there was to make such a ruling in 1972. Some of their reasons are different today for
desiring to preserve this ruling, but it is unmistakable that the same forces
at work then are alive and well today.
Did you know the decision was made by a court with only 7
justices? Did you know that two had “abruptly
retired from the court” and that one of the two died within a week of
retirement and the other after only three months? Did you know both of them were conservatives
and may very well have voted against this ruling, and thus changing the history
of our nation?
Did you know that the case was never heard in a court of
appeals, which is the normal course for any case reviewed by the Supreme
Court?
I encourage everyone with any interest at all in
overturning this case to get a copy of this book and prepare yourself to fight
the war of public opinion from a legal standpoint. All of us as Catholics have battled for the
right to life for decades. The liberal
left driven by Freemasonry has argued back, FREEDOM, LIBERTY, PRIVACY, and
RIGHT TO CHOOSE!!!!
Their argument is attractive, in spite of the evil it
espouses. What we need to do now that we
have the opportunity to dominate the court with sane and morally sound justices,
is to understand the law better than they do.
We need to know why that law was unjust, unconstitutional, and an
outrageous display of power beyond the bounds of the third branch of
government. We need to tell them---the uneducated
women and men in this country everything they need to know but would never dare
to ask.
The effort to overturn this ruling must be done not from
an emotional or a religious or a moral basis, however sincere and just those
may be, but by the book, in judicial form, and with the best legal minds
our country has ever put on the bench. They
will need us, the public, to support their actions if the country is to survive
the leftist outrage sure to occur when this law is taken away. It won’t be enough to say we won and you
lost.
Clarke Forsythe has written this history in easy to read
prose that should not be difficult for any adult to digest. A law degree is not a requirement to
understand it.
Pray. Invite God
to be with us in this battle, leading us back to greener pastures, where His
will is in our hearts and the laws of our nation reflect His laws.
There was a second case right with or close to this that was "Doe vs Bolton" which I think was the one that opened up the killing of the unborn through all 9 months of gestation.
ReplyDeleteYou're right M. Prodigal. Doe defined "health" which Roe said could allow abortion in the third trimester to include the woman's mental and physical health, her family situation and even her age. If she was too old or too young to be pregnant she could have an abortion. The two decisions together said a woman could have an abortion in the first two trimesters for no reason and in the third for any reason. That's how we got abortion on demand. And now the liberals have extended it to infanticide with a number of abortionists willing to murder the baby who survives an abortion. We rival the Third Reich in our barbarism.
ReplyDelete