Guest Post: Queer and Tranny Whack-a-Mole?

Do you think this makes their mothers and grandmothers feel proud?

Editor's comment: I think the observations in this guest post are spot on. Deviance will take the heat as long as what they're promoting gets attention. Do they hope to reach a fatigue threshhold where people just stop pushing back because they've been surrounded on the battlefield? One military strategy is to outflank your opponent. This post identifies the problem, we're being outflanked and constantly under attack. It's exhausting! So what is the smart way to counterattack? Certainly the Bud Light response is one way and the boycott seems to be increasing and hopefully will run Anheuser-Busch into bankruptcy. Here's a bit from a market analysis:

...it seems no one is happy, as now the transgender community is also upset the company has not defended the backlash against Mulvaney. Folks, the bottom line here is that the latest figures suggest the backlash is having a true and lasting impact on the beer brand's U.S. revenue. This May has seen the degree of sales declines accelerate, capped by this 29.5% decline for the week ending 5/23. In April, the impact was a bit muted as the boycott began to spread more. 

Let's hope the Dodgers see the same impact from their decision to feature the vile group, Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence. They have a new strategy with Christian pitcher, Clayton Kershaw condemning management's decision and then announcing they are bringing back "Christian Faith and Family Day." Who are they kidding. Keep in mind that tran "indulgence" includes child corruption and abuse. So, hey, let's celebrate cutting off children's sex organs and then have a day celebrating Christian families. Get real, Dodgers!

We have a voice and when we join together that voice is loud and clear. Let me make a suggestion for this pride in sodomy month.  If you see a pride message at the library or a retailer, tell them you won't be back for the rest of the month, because you are grossly offended by a celebration of anal sex and mutilation of children. Will it make any difference? Only God knows. You don't have to be angry. You can even say it with a smile. "Do you think offending your patrons is a good strategy? Why don't you just be quiet instead of promoting something so divisive. And, by the way, how come those who died defending our country get one day; while those tearing down our values get a month?" Hey, it might even make you feel good! Courage is a virtue. Pray and then act!

And now here's Tom's post:

Queer and Tranny Whack-a-Mole?

By Thomas Walsh

Has anyone noticed how suspiciously sequential these various companies seem to be with foisting their tranny and LGBQ-WTH products and programs onto their paying customers? Over the past few years we have had Target (now twice), Gillette, Ambercrombie & Fitch, Anheuser-Busch, General Foods, major league sports, Hershey's, etc., using stockholder money to force the queer agenda into our culture. Now PetSmart is getting into the act with their "Pride-themed" clothing for pets.

But notice the apparent pattern. Company A comes out (pun intended) with its queer product(s), the public get outraged and begins boycotting it so its profits and stock drops. At that point, suddenly Company B introduces its tranny and homosexual products and policies. The media immediately turns the public's attention and ire onto Company B. It then loses many of its customers, revenue, and stock value. All the while Company A slowly, quietly, recovers most of its former, short-attention-span customers and revenue without retracting its offensive products and policies. Before long, just as Company B is reaching its pain point, it's rinse-and-repeat with Company C, then D, and so on.

The common thread are the corporate boards. Nearly all like-minded directors are active board members of multiple companies. So, it is inevitable that their liberal policies and programs will span over all of the disparate corporations they control. The interesting thing, though, is the apparent timing which to an outside observer suggests a deliberately coordinated program. If an overwhelming number of companies suddenly flooded the marketplace with deviant products they would risk the public's angry pushback. Instead, these directors may be colluding to identify the financial and "good will" pain points of their companies, and coordinating the timetables to divert attention - with the lapdog media's eager cooperation - when a company approaches its particular threshold. In short, a progressive game of Whack-A-Mole to achieve their satanic goals by keeping the public and consumers off-balance and overwhelmed until it is too late.