Search This Blog

Showing posts with label infanticide. Show all posts
Showing posts with label infanticide. Show all posts

Thursday, March 21, 2019

It's Magic: Human Rights Depend on Purple-Winged Fairies (Or Aliens)



Pro-aborts continually claim science for their point of view. Hey, pay no attention to that ultra-sound or the scientific measurements of brain waves and heartbeats. Babies  Blobs in the womb aren't human. They are just...uh...um...mmm... cantaloupes? carrots? brussel sprouts?

Wednesday, February 6, 2019

Hope you got a large popcorn: The Virginia show is turning into a triple feature!


The Three Stooges: Mark Herring, Ralph Northam, and Justin Fairfax
Ya just gotta laugh at the Virginia road show featuring the three stooges! Ralph Northam (the guv), Justin Fairfax (the assistant guv), and Mark Herring (the AG) are now all flapping in the wind hoisted on their own petards. (I explained that expression here.)

State of the Union and the Selfish Women in White

"Democrats for Infanticide!" or maybe "No Baby Left Unmurdered"  ought to be slogans for the Democrat women in white at last night's State of the Union. They high-fived and cheered for themselves when Trump talked about advances for women. Like happy, clappy little narcissists they only care about what benefits them.


Friday, February 1, 2019

Todd Gilbert, Majority Leader of Virginia's House of Delegates, Shines Light on the Abortion Bill



Stop wringing your hands and get to work. It's time to start thinking about the next election cycle in Virginia or your own state. Overturning Roe v. Wade is NOT the only priority. Doing everything possible at the state level to protect the mother and encourage her to seriously consider her actions is imperative!

Monday, October 28, 2013

The Fruit of Abortion: Murdering Newborns

Don't you know...it's the "in" thing!

That Victoria’s Secret baby is just the tip of a disturbing trend

A baby born alive and smothered by mom? What's the big deal anyway? She had the right before birth to kill the kid; she just extended her right fifteen minutes. So why should anybody be upset? "Ethicists" have suggested giving the right of materfamilias to kill the baby after birth if it's defective. What's a defect? Ugliness? New babies are pretty ugly -- all purple and splotchy and sometimes pimply and coneheaded. And if the kid is screaming in the night a few weeks later just put a sock in his mouth to shut him up. Yup, that's the Planned Parenthood culture. You plan not to have a kid and you have the right not to have a kid no matter what you have to do to achieve your right to choose not to be a parent. Killing babies may make the Washington Post's In List this New Year's. It's been in the Democrats' platform for years! And who are you to judge that it's a barbaric practice and a crime against humanity? We came from the jungle remember? Survival of the fittest...and the biggest. Better start your Kung Fu and weight training for when they come for you.

Sunday, June 30, 2013

Lesbian Houston Mayor Helps the Abortion Industry

Let's get these videos to go viral. Douglas Karpen is Houston's' Kermit Gosnell. Karpen kills babies who survive abortion by wringing their necks or snipping their spinal columns with scissors. He is no less a monster than Gosnell. And yet, Karpen and Planned Parenthood of Houston are being protected and enabled by Houston police and elected officials like lesbian Houston mayor Annise Parker. Justice is being obstructed in Houston the same way justice was obstructed in Kansas by Governor Kathleen Sebelius who protected late-term abortionist George Tiller. Abortionists make beaucoup bucks and they are happy to invest some of them buying the support of local politicians.

Pass these to all your social media links. Karpen is committing acts that violate Texas law. Murdering already born babies is illegal. That isn't abortion; it's infanticide and we haven't made that legal....yet!



Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Planned Parenthood: It's Not Just about Babies in the Womb any More





Planned Parenthood position: If babies are born alive after abortion, leave it up to the doctor (who just tried to kill the baby) and the patient (who hired him to kill) to decide whether the baby gets to live. Now we all know how Kermit Gosnell handled this "problem." He got a scissors and snipped the baby's spine sometimes joking that the baby was almost big enough to walk away. Note how Planned Parenthood's rep danced around every question never giving a straight answer. She couldn't even say a baby on the table, moving and breathing should be given medical care and be transported to a hospital. Obviously Planned Parenthood wants the result to be what the woman and doctor planned at the beginning -- a dead baby. No babies should be allowed to survive abortion! Period. They are non-persons even outside the womb - i.e., as newborns. So if that living, kicking newborn baby on the table doesn't have a right to life, exactly when does a baby merit legal protection?

One last question...is it any wonder mothers are committing infanticide? After all, that baby is their property -- didn't Planned Parenthood say so? And the "health care provider" (killing is health care?) is only there to carry out the mom's wishes. So if there's no health care provider around, why exactly can't the mom finish the job without one. After all, the baby is only two (seconds, minutes, hours, days, months) old and even if she wanted the baby at first isn't it a woman's prerogative to change her mind?

Now you would think the media would cover this story wouldn't you? Hey, the biggest abortion supporter in the country opposing legislation to care for a living, breathing newborn sounds like news to me. But the only ones covering the story are pro-life sources and conservative media. A critical article about media bias at Red State was posted on the Washington Post blog,  (I suppose that's supposed to prove they aren't biased, eh?) but where are the articles? Where's the commentary opposing or defending Planned Parenthood?  There isn't any in the mainstream media that I could find, but we all know where they stand. Silence in the law indicates consent. The media carries water for PP. They always have and apparently there is no PP atrocity with which they won't cooperate. In this case they are covering for PP's appalling position by whistling past the graveyard -- literally. Just kill them like Kermit Gosnell or throw them in the coffin alive and bury them quick.

Monday, March 5, 2012

Do You Favor "After-Birth Abortion?"

From California Catholic:
“What we call ‘after-birth abortion’ – killing a newborn – should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled,” Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva argue in their paper entitled “After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?” ...The authors say the practice should be called “after-birth abortion, rather than infanticide,” in order to “emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus – on which ‘abortions’ in the traditional sense are performed – rather than to that of a child.” ... 
According to Giubilini and Minerva, both an unborn fetus and a newborn child can be legitimately killed because “both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual.” 
“Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life,’” they state in their article. 
Let's see...permissible in "all the cases where abortion is." Since abortion is allowed for any and all reasons, does that mean the parents who wanted a boy can kill the little girl? Can parents who don't like the looks of the kid, kill the one they consider ugly? If the baby has a cleft palate or a deformed foot or any other disfigurement do they call the "after-birth abortion squad" to off the little non-person?

What kind of "ethicists" suggest this? Logical ones who realize (as pro-lifers do) that there is no difference between the baby waiting to born and the little one in the delivery room.

There are monsters among us who look like normal human beings. They believe pigs have more rights than babies; they support the murder of children up to birth; and now they think that same right should be extended after birth.

When does the right end, I wonder? Are teenagers fully human?

Monday, January 16, 2012

The Fruit of Abortion

A newborn infant found on a D.C. doorstep dies of exposure. 

And why not leave a baby alone on a frigid night to die in the cold? After all, she was only about a week old and could have been legally murdered only days ago. This is the fruit of abortion. Hey, if I could kill the baby last week, what's to stop me killing her this week? So she's born already, so what? It's my body that she making demands on. It's my life she's interfering with. So good-bye baby. Too bad for you. This is America in the 21st century thanks to organizations like the National Organization for Women, Planned Parenthood, the National Abortion Rights Action League, and other groups of their ilk. They are making this country a cruel and ugly place for the young.

Sunday, October 23, 2011

Infanticide? Canadian Judge Has No Problem With It

A Canadian judge gave a 19-year-old mom a three year suspended sentence for strangling her newborn son and tossing him over into a neighbor's yard. LifeSiteNews quoted the judge excusing the woman based on Canada's abortion laws:
The part of the ruling Judge Veit issued that received significant opposition related to Veit’s decision that Canada’s acceptance of legalized abortion entitled Effert to kill her child. Judge Veit ruled, according to multiple media reports, that because Canada allows abortions it reflects how “while many Canadians undoubtedly view abortion as a less than ideal solution to unprotected sex and unwanted pregnancy, they generally understand, accept and sympathize with the onerous demands pregnancy and childbirth exact from mothers, especially mothers without support.”

“Naturally, Canadians are grieved by an infant’s death, especially at the hands of the infant’s mother, but Canadians also grieve for the mother,” said Veit, who said that, while what Effert did was “very grave,” there were no aggravating factors. Prosecutors said the aggravating factors included how Effert initially lied to police about whether she was a virgin and how she initially tried to blame the father of the child for her actions.

“I am of the view that those actions, along with the action of throwing her baby’s body over her back fence, are painful evidence of Ms. Effert’s irrational behavior as a result of her disturbed mind,”the judge said, according to the Sun News Network. “In summary, this is a classic infanticide case – the killing of a newborn or a justborn after a hidden pregnancy by a mother who was alone and unsupported.”
Uh...let's see. Being "alone and unsupported" (while living in your parents' home) gives you the right to kill your newborn without legal consequence. Hey, why stop at newborns. Why not allow parents to kill their children after a divorce or after the death of a spouse. After all, raising children alone certainly reflects "onerous demands."

Life is cheap these days. Kill babies before birth, commit infaticide after birth, kill off the kids your boyfriend doesn't like, kill your elderly parents, kill yourself with a little help from your doc. Talk about a culture of death! But don't let it get you down. Think of the benefit to the planet when all those carbon footprints are eliminated.

Grape kool-aid, anyone?

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Baby Murder: It's not just for the unborn anymore.

The stories of mothers/parents disposing their newborns in dumpsters, down laundry chutes, stabbing, etc. are becoming so common they have spurred special laws in some states. Mothers can drop off their babies anonymously at hospitals within a week or so of birth if they don't want them. No questions asked no charges.

What are we seeing here? The inevitable result of a sex-crazed culture that preaches lust without consequences. Hey, you get pregnant, kill the kid. Well for some, the distinction between killing before birth and killing after has blurred. And why not? If it is perfectly fine to kill a child before birth why should anyone have qualms about killing a newborn? It's just a question of a few minutes between legal and illegal. The sexual revolution has unhinged many young people from fundamental morality. Their moral code is "I can do whatever I want." And that's what's happening. Read it an weep and understand why it is so important to fight abortion, contraception, and sex ed. They are the unholy trinity of lust. And there is a strong connection between sexual immorality and violence. The stories below are a fraction of those popping up all over the country. We have reached the ultimate disposable society. Relationships are disposable and so are the babies conceived as a result of them.

16-year-old North Carolina teen Rebecca Blackmore stabbed newborn, left body in her closet: cops

Parents Throw Newborn Baby Into Dumpster

18-Year-Old Hides Pregnancy, Then Allegedly Throws Newborn Down Trash Chute in Florida While on Vacation

Police locate mother of baby found alive in Emporia dumpster

Mother Throws Newborn Into Snowbank

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

When they call it "safe," they mean it's safe for the abortionist's pocketbook!

Another abortionist is in trouble with the law. Dr. Kermit Gosnell is being charged in the death of a woman and the deliberate murder of seven babies born alive after abortion. Pro-abortion shills love to talk about "safe" abortion, but they turn their backs on the women, mostly poor, who are butchered by the front alley killers. Well, here's one who may be brought to justice. Let's pray so. Some people still consider it infanticide to kill a baby born alive who's moving, breathing, crying. It's hard to even imagine the callousness of a person who can pick up that living infant of six, seven, or eight gestational months and deliberately cut the child's spinal cord with a scissors to guarantee a dead baby. Investigators suspect the "doctor" of killing hundreds of babies that way in the course of his 30 year practice. The "clinic" was described as a "house of horrors" with floors covered by blood and animals roaming the offices and using litter boxes in the same rooms where surgeries are performed. He even had a 15-year-old high school student serving as an anesthesiologist. There must be a special place in the depths of hell for folks like this if they die unrepentant.

Philadelphia Abortion Doctor Facing 8 Counts Of Murder

Monday, August 2, 2010

Why Should This Surprise Anyone?


This AP story reports that many are horrified over what this woman did? Why? The babies were unwanted. Doesn't she have self determination. And her method of post natal abortion is a lot more compassionate that pulling a baby out feet first, stabbing him in the neck with a scissors, and sucking out his brain or burning his skin off with saline solution.

 Hey, this woman was just pro-choice and her choice was no babies. The natural development of the abortion mentality is infanticide and we've been moving that way for years. Why should anyone be surprised and horrified (except for those pathetic pro-lifers who are always waving the bloody fetus) when it actually happens? There's not much difference between the full term baby and the little ones shown in the trash bag. Maybe her lawyer should try to get the charge changed to performing an illegal post natal abortion.

Friday, December 18, 2009

Yes, Virginia, Infanticide is A-okay!

This is the natural result of abortion and it wasn't the first case as the quote below shows. The baby is unwanted? Kill it. This mom just used the economy plan. A lot cheaper than visiting a late-term abortion mill. Bob McDonnell says he'll sign a bill to close the loophill. It won't help this poor little one, but may save others. If this case doesn't trip your horrified switch, something's wrong with your wiring.

State law loophole means mother will not be charged in the death of her newborn

loophole in VA law allows mothers to kill newborns

The Campbell County Sheriff’s Office and Commonwealth’s Attorney’s office worked unsuccessfully to get the law changed after another baby died in the county in a similar case. Emerson said they asked two delegates and one state senator to take the issue up in the General Assembly. He says the three lawmakers refused because they felt the issue was too close to the abortion issue.

Monday, October 27, 2008

"Choose life that you and your children may live."



This video is so powerful I've decided to make an exception to my no YouTube rule to post it. Please pass it on to others. And please pray and fast that on election day God's will may be done.

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Fr. Corapi describes AMERICA'S DEATH WISH!

Listen to this fifteen minute teaching on the disintegration of American culture. If you love our country, listen to Father's words, take them to heart, and begin to transform your own family, your parish and your precinct, your diocese and your county. Fight for the faith! How to begin? Join in the 40 Days for Life Campaign to start. If there is no activity in a city near you, join in spirit. Go to daily Mass and raise up your prayers with all those fighting for the unborn. We cannot save our country, but God through the intercession of the Blessed Mother will. Devote yourself to the message of Fatima. Put on the armour of God and wield the sword of the spirit, the word of God through Holy Scripture. On this feast of the guardian angels join your prayers with all the angels and saints for our poor country and our poor world.