This is irrelevant. Romney is very image-conscious and is known for extravagant grandstanding measures and I'm sure the cost of this search was considered an investment in his political career. I'm sure many of the parents of Massachusetts teens would have plenty of words to revile Romney for his ushering in the homo-crats. Just look at the "Mass Resistance" website to see the kind of state our country will emulate with Romney. Or worse.Sorry, but Ron Paul fits truer to the Catholic faith. He has not vowed fealty to Planned Parenthood, as Romney has. He is bound to do better amongst Repubs now that Santorum is out. And better amongst libertarians (and maybe many democrats can be pealed away from Obama because to vote for Paul). Please don't think November is a foregone conclusion.
Is Ron Paul going to run as a third party candidate? That would surprise me. But I don't disagree with you at all. Romney's positions are awful and once again the left can't lose. That's why Obama won the first time. McCain was a joke and the Republicans never learn. http://massresistance.org/romney/
I don't know if he will run third party but why not support him for Republican nomination? Why not petition Santorum to release his delegates to Paul rather than Romney if he's the great Catholic he says he is?Everyone says Romney is the only one who can beat Obama but I think that's backwards from the truth - Romney is the Soros-globalist-homocrat Republican who cannot easily be distinguished from Obama, so why would anyone vote for him. Those who voted for him in the primaries are the same ones who put us up to McCain in 2008, who promptly went to sleep.Don't be fooled again.