Search This Blog

Monday, May 30, 2016

129 Page Dossier on Fr. Pedro Corces

The beleaguered St Rose of Lima, Miami Shores
When Googling the name of Alberto Cardenas, Fr Pedro Corce’s prostitute lover, the Internet conveniently coughed up the 129 page Dossier prepared by a private investigator for Christifidelis at St Rose of Lima, Miami Shores. To say the least, the Dossier makes clear that Fr Corces is more interested in sex and pleasure, vacations and beauty products rather than Christ Jesus and the care of his parishioners’ souls guiding them to Heaven.

After reading this I was incredulous that Archbishop Wenski could even think of castigating the faithful with charges of “slanderous gossip, calumny and detraction” much less publically say it. But as ever, protecting those priests who are perverted is the job of an archbishop I suppose, since apparently parish unity is more important than dismissing a priest for sexual improprieties with a male prostitute, there being a priest shortage and all. But a priest immersed in the filth of homosexuality, lying, and living a private life of grave sin with a male prostitute cannot lead souls to heaven. It’s impossible. 

All former bulletins on St Rose of Lima’s website have been scrubbed, the Archdiocese of Miami (ADOM) is in frantic damage control, and Archbishop Wenski is probably hoping no one surfaces with a big, “I told you so”.  [I’ll send him an email.]

One more bit of information: Fr Pedro Corces was the Vocations Director for the Archdiocese of Miami from 1996 to 2006. Granted, Archbishop Wenski was Coadjutor Bishop of Orlando from 2003-2004 then Bishop of Orlando from 2004-2010, however he was an Auxiliary Bishop in Miami from 1997-2003. Therefore during the 7 overlapping years when he was in the Miami Chancery he must have has some input as to who would be the Archdiocese's Vocations Director. I wonder how many vocations Fr Pedro Corces got for Miami...that is, good and holy men for the priesthood.


Mary Ann Kreitzer said...

"I wonder how many vocations Fr Pedro Corces got for Miami...that is, good and holy men for the priesthood."

Probably lots of vocations of same-sex attracted men looking for an easy life, and access to easy cash. "Good and holy men?" -- few if any!

Anonymous said...

I recommend sending the dossier to Robert Cardinal Sarah, head of the Congregation for Liturgy and the Sacraments. I am reading his interview/book "God or Nothing" and he is 100% sound on all issues. Maybe he can do something.


susan said...

read the dossier and it nearly made me retch. Wenski should have been outraged at the pervert priest, not the poor, beaten, abused flock!!! But, birds of a feather cover for each other. I pray that God cleans out the dung from His temple...SOON.

Matt C. Abbott said...

Sad, but not surprising. The homosexual subculture is deeply entrenched in the Church. Of course, some dioceses are worse than others.

Anonymous said...

Yes this has been the tragic situation in many Diocese and Orders for a very long time.
Sodomite Diocesan Vocational Directors and Seminary Rectors have been recruiting like their minded ilk.
The late Fr John O'Conner was the first I knew of who publicly stepped out to to blow the whistle on the practice in his audio tape "The Antichrist" in 1986.

Alfredo R said...

Mathew 25:34-46

“Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’

“Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’

“The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’

“Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’

“They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’
“He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’

“Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”

Fr. Pedro Corces is unquestionably at the right of Jesus; his slanderers at the left.

As well put by a parishioner, there is one TRUTH: “The picture they [Christifidelis] present of him is completely opposed to the Fr. Pedro Corces that I have known for many years….and everyone else that have through him experienced the Gospel being made present in the world around us, mainly on His care for the poor, for the discarded, for any one in need of His word and support in their needs and sufferings.”

The hundreds of testimonies already received in support of Fr. Corces confirm this one and only TRUTH: he is a very good man.

Stop the free lynching without verification of information.

Anonymous said...

"I wonder how many vocations Fr Pedro Corces got for Miami...that is, good and holy men for the priesthood."

Why don't you read your own "dossier"? On Page 121: "Fr. Cruces was known to recruit young boys from third-world countries, from unprivileged backgrounds, and recruit them for the Archdiocese's seminaries. These men are groomed to engage in sexual relations with the older homosexual priests of the Archdiocese."

This page (121) gives the parishes of three other priests who are known to be "notorious promiscuous"or "flagrantly" homosexual--one has a steady lover. Have they been asked to resign? Seems they could be identified very easily.

Pages 122-23 gives the letter of a candidate for the priesthood who was turned away. It is the same story Michael Rose told (ANYONE who enters the seminary must absolve contraception, must be open to sodomites, adultery (for the divorced protestants like Ronald Reagan), women priests, and giving up Jesus Christ for ecumenicism. But still you all act like your priest is good and holy--not a weak, lying, sodomite/alcoholic prostitute who's stringing you along w/lies and in turn keeps you stringing as many as you can in servicing sodomites while pretending you are serving and worshiping God. Michael Voris reports that the NY Archdiocese is a sodomite cesspool and everyone ignores the story instead of rioting or striking (a reverse interdict) until change is made.

Your "sadness" and blase shrugs while pedophiles rape (and 'sex educate') children is disgraceful (page 68): "We are also alarmed because of the danger Father Pedro exposes our children to  through the people he appoints to work in close proximity with them.  We are further alarmed that this pattern goes back as illustrated by the Miguel Cala case.  In July 2012, Channel 10 reported on Miguel Cala, a pedophile that had been a seminarian under Father Pedro’s tenure as vocations director for the Archdiocese, and that Father Pedro screened and recommended for a job at St. Andrews Catholic School in Coral Springs where he then went on to molest boys.  Below are links to this story as well as excerpts from the first: Miguel Cala case articles:"‐molesters‐talk‐with‐victims‐father‐could‐impact‐

The redacted report was published in 2011 (FIVE YEARS AGO, ABBOTT!):

An Archdiocesan official sought out "young boys from third-world countries, from unprivileged backgrounds, and recruited them for the Archdiocese's seminaries. These men [were] groomed to engage in sexual relationships with the older homosexual priests of the Archdiocese." Until 1998, this official owned a home with a male lover in northern Miami.

"I wonder how many vocations Fr Pedro Corces got for Miami...that is, good and holy men for the priesthood." Is that what you really wonder--or is that some cover to excuse your own sin?

Aqua said...

Alfredo said: "Stop the free lynching without verification of information."

Words fail me. At some point, one becomes complicit in these heinous crimes that cry out to God for vengeance, if they fail to act in the presence of overwhelming evidence such as this.

129 pages of specificity, personal observations with pictures and supporting documents, by an unbiased professional investigator .... I think this qualifies as "verification"; Especially in light of the current onslaught of homosexual Priest after homosexual Priest, in Dioscese after Dioscese all over the country and the world. On and on it goes, and has been going for decades.

So, in the face of all that .... "All is well"? Really?! That equals complicity in my book. Most people, most normal people, are getting pretty fed up with it. The credibility of Bishops who do not take evidence like this seriously; who do not come to their flocks' spiritual aid, is crumbling.

We all should approach our particular judgement with fear and trembling; Bishops no less than the rest of us. We should pray for them, because their responsibility before God is enormous. The spiritual crimes of our age are massive and Bishops who SPEAK not; who DO not .... Beware!

Unknown said...

They are not priests. They are not bishops. They are not cardinals.

They are male prostitutes.

Susan Matthiesen said...

Excuse me, Mike Ference? I know you've had hard times, and I'm hoping you don't mean that all priests, bishops and cardinals are what you say in the above comment because that is absolutely not true and you know it.

Marie said...

Rolon is part of his club. F.Alfredo Rolon please, in the name of Jesus you have to step down too.This is not politis how many votes. This is a VOCATION.

Anonymous said...

I think what Mr Ference is trying to say is that just as we are taught Proper Intention is required for the valid reception of a Sacrament, the Sacrament of Holy Orders itself is valid only with the Proper Intention.
Knowing that sodomite Seminary Rectors and Vocation Directors turned away good men and recruited homosexuals begs the question if some are real priests, Bishops and Cardinals.
This is different from the Intention to Transubstantiate or administer a Sacrament
I am speaking of actual valid Reception of a Sacrament, as I believe Mr Ference is also. EVEN the Sacrament of Matrimony can be considered null if one or the other partys presents themselves under false pretenses. i.e as a Baptized Christian.
I know because it happened to us when fifteen years after our Nuptial Marriage in the Church my husband decided to become a Catholic.He searched every Lutheren Church around and finally called his elderly Masonic mother in Florida who admitted they lied to the priest who in turn did not require written proof.
My husband did not lie, his parents did . So all his sins were forgiven when he became a Catholic through Baptism! LOL,"So not fair" I thought............
But I did personally ask a retired priest Canon Lawyer about the Proper Intention in the Reception of the Sacrament of Holy Orders.....and he responded after a long sigh. "It appears the Vatican BETTER redefine Proper Intention for he validity question of many of these priests."

Mike is ABSOLUTELY correct. Active sodomites recruited into the priesthood by the same and for that purpose are NOT priests, or Bishops or Cardinals and according to AvH Bella Dodd as a Communist Party member placed many of them in the seminary under orders directly from 4 Cardinal Communist Party bosses in the Vatican way back in 1939!
Personally I believe we have much quite a few less clerics and prelates than we think.
Was Maciel a REAL priest? Ans: A resounding NO!

Mary quite Contrary said...

Proper Intention for validly administering the Sacraments and for valid Reception of a Sacrament are two very different things.

An active sodomite seeking a pious image as cover for his perverted secret life and a field of males to harvest for his debauched sex drive, who receives the Sacrament of Holy Orders, does so both Illicitly and Invalidly.
He is no priest, just a male pimp or anal and oral prostitute and more oft than not a pedophile or ephebophile ! A rose by any other name smells the same, no matter how much the Bishops and Psyches want to parse terminology.

"As to the recipients of the sacraments, it is certain that no intention is required in children who have not yet reached the age of reason, or in imbeciles, for the validity of those sacraments which they are capable of receiving. In the case of adults, on the other hand, some intention is indispensable if the sacrament is not to be invalid."

So now we can see why the world is sinking into an amoral sinful abyss !
The LACK of Sanctifying Grace which is why the Church teaches that Jesus instituted the Sacraments as an aide in resisting the near temptation to sin...Temptation?
How can there be temptation when the "disordered" and many clerics want us to believe that hx's are born that way and that "love is love"?

Anonymous said...

I have observed M Voris and his CMTV staff intentionally ignore the above question multiple times in comments by posters, allowing instead the question to be skipped over by another poster who applies the "operendi" excuse erroneously to the valid and licit RECEPTION of a sacrament, particularly Holy Orders.
Like the Canon Lawyer, they simply have no answer to substantiate a "Proper Intention" for the reception of the Sacrament of Holy Orders, as applied to the intentional recruitment of active sodomite men into the priesthood.

Anonymous said...

"Peschiulli: I am being a priest in every sense."

Ya think? I sure don't!

Anonymous said...

The Collateral Damage of clerical abuse

I do not know if you want to publish this Susan. I wish to drive this message home to people. Sorrowfully so many of the adolescent and child victims of this clerical sodomite abuse nightmare go on to believe they are themselves homosexuals.
The retired Detective of over thirty years who started this blog can attest to this fact. He investigated pederast cases for the state and made no bones that priestly abuse was by far the worst because of the consequences for both the victim, their families and society in general.

One particular victim runs a blog on which he posts many stories. He is a very sick man . Now he has "come out" believing himself a homosexual too.He encourages others who were sodomized by priest homosexuals to "come out" also and even published a you tube video of one of his friends. It is hard to watch but it typifies the damage that has been done to these children and adolescents. The defenders of the crime can parse the psychological terminology all they want i.e. pedophile or eubophile, but the mental and spiritual results are more often than not the same. These males believe they ARE homosexuals and the sodomite priests know they Mrs Engel correctly pointed out in the Preface to her book "Rite of Sodomy", and victims have related to her and I have also have been told, "Now you are one of us." This is the Satanic "grace" that comes from this Rite.
The video the blog owner above published of his "friend" who was also sodomized.

Anonymous said...

Marie you speak of Fr Rolon, is this something you know for a fact ?

Marie said...

One was Miguel Cala, convicted of child abuse in a Catholic school

Marie said...

Wenski always the same