Read the article. The White House knew this was no attack rising from a "spontaneous demonstration" from the very beginning. They spun a tale to support Obama's story that al Qaeda was on the run. The Benghazi fabrication was all about the election and the lives our people meant nothing. It was all about what's good for Obama. It's ALWAYS about what's good for Obama.
A big question: Why was the security reduced as things heated up? Is the speculation that there was a "kidnapping" plan accurate?:
According to a report from the Washington Times, retired 4 Star Admiral James Lyons reveals the entire plot that led to the deaths of Americans in Libya that could have been prevented, who gave the orders, and why events took place as they tragically did. Admiral James Lyons is probably the highest ranking figure ever to intervene in a federal government criminal case, and testify. Thanks to this man’s dedication to his country and the truth, we will finally know the truth and who was responsible. In his words Lyons says that the attack on Benghazi was a bungled kidnapping attempt to be perpetrated upon Ambassador Stevens. This was to appear to be a hostage exchange for a terrorist prisoner who was to be released in trade for a supposedly captured US ambassador. The trade would have been for Omar Abdel Rahman an international prisoner, known as the Blind Sheikh.
This apparent abduction by terrorists of our ambassador and then negotiated trade for the Blind Sheikh would have been the “October Surprise” that would have elevated President Obama’s flagging popularity and boosted his approval ratings for a re-election. (More here...)Was Ambassador Stevens involved in arms running? This mess looks like Watergate/Iran Contra on steroids. I think ultimately the truth is a lot more sinister than the White House fiction.